Quality of life in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review of the literature (2001–2008)
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper was to provide a comprehensive, contemporary systematic review of studies that have examined the quality of life (QOL) of survivors of childhood cancer in order to extend upon the findings of earlier reviews. Materials and methods A review was conducted that used the databases MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. Articles were included that were published in English between 2001 and 2008 and used quantitative measures and statistical tests to compare health-related quality of life (HRQL) or QOL of childhood cancer survivors with population norms or matched comparison groups. Results Thirteen studies were identified. Findings were contradictory across studies, yet by and large, reflected those of past reviews. In general, survivors' scores on subscales representing physical, psychological, and social domains of HRQL/QOL were similar to comparisons, with the greatest differences being in physical well-being. Key personal and environmental factors were negatively correlated with the three domains across studies for survivors including: older age at diagnosis, longer time since diagnosis, certain cancer and treatment types, female gender, and a number of socioeconomic factors. Conclusions Lack of comparability across studies remains a problem due to wide variation in study focus and designs. Conceptual and methodological issues include: use of numerous HRQOL and QOL measures, lack of distinction between conceptualization and measurement of HRQL and QOL, lack of initial qualitative input from survivors about QOL, little examination of the influence of environmental factors on QOL, little attention to survivors' satisfaction with life quality, use of small heterogeneous samples, and need for population-based longitudinal studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The analyses adjusted for attained age, sex, number of health conditions, and time since diagnosis to mitigate potential confounding.
“Associations were assessed with regression analysis, adjusting for attained age, sex, number of health conditions, and time since diagnosis, while correcting for multiple testing ( p < 0.004).”
From Risk and Protective Factors of Psychosocial Functioning in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Results of the DCCSS-LATER Study (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Certain subgroups of childhood cancer survivors report worse health-related quality of life compared to general population norms and experience symptoms like anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress.
“However, certain subgroups report worse HRQOL compared to general population norms, and experience symptoms like anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress [4, 5].”
From Risk and Protective Factors of Psychosocial Functioning in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Results of the DCCSS-LATER Study (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Cites
The MOS Short-form General Health Survey: Reliability and Validity in a Patient Population
Stewart, A. L., Hays, R. D., & Ware, J. E. (1988) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007 · Cited by 3,339 · see citing works
Furlong, W. J., Feeny, D. H., Torrance, G. W., & Barr, R. D. (2001) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.3109/07853890109002092 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Michel, G., Brinkman, T. M., Wakefield, C. E., & Grootenhuis, M. (2020) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2020.07.005 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Maas, A., Maurice‐Stam, H., Kremer, L. C. M., van der Aa‐van Delden, A., van Dulmen‐den Broeder, E., Tissing, W. J. E., Loonen, J. J., van der Pal, H. J. H., de Vries, A. C. H., van den Heuvel‐Eibrink, M. M., et al. (2023) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.34795 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Maas, A., Maurice‐Stam, H., Feijen, E. A. M. (., Teepen, J. C., van der Aa‐van Delden, A. M., Streefkerk, N., van Dulmen‐den Broeder, E., Tissing, W. J. E., Loonen, J. J., van der Pal, H. J. H., et al. (2024) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.9313 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“However, certain subgroups report worse HRQOL compared to general population norms, and experience symptoms like anxiety, depression, and post‐ traumatic stress [4, 5].”
- Authors
- McDougall, J., & Tsonis, M.
- Affiliations
- Thames Valley Children's Centre (CA)
- Western University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- McDougall, Janette
- ORCID
- McDougall, Janette
- Venue
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2009-06-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1231-1246
- ISSN
- 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7339
- OpenAlex
- W2091208519
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
- Keywords
- childhood cancer survivors, quality of life, health-related quality of life, physical well-being, psychological well-being, social well-being, age at diagnosis, treatment type, socioeconomic factors, gender differences, life satisfaction
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Social Support, Treatment Outcome, Survivors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review