Cited by 115Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and careAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research

Quality of life in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review of the literature (2001–2008)

McDougall, Janette, Tsonis, Miranda·2009·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper was to provide a comprehensive, contemporary systematic review of studies that have examined the quality of life (QOL) of survivors of childhood cancer in order to extend upon the findings of earlier reviews. Materials and methods A review was conducted that used the databases MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. Articles were included that were published in English between 2001 and 2008 and used quantitative measures and statistical tests to compare health-related quality of life (HRQL) or QOL of childhood cancer survivors with population norms or matched comparison groups. Results Thirteen studies were identified. Findings were contradictory across studies, yet by and large, reflected those of past reviews. In general, survivors' scores on subscales representing physical, psychological, and social domains of HRQL/QOL were similar to comparisons, with the greatest differences being in physical well-being. Key personal and environmental factors were negatively correlated with the three domains across studies for survivors including: older age at diagnosis, longer time since diagnosis, certain cancer and treatment types, female gender, and a number of socioeconomic factors. Conclusions Lack of comparability across studies remains a problem due to wide variation in study focus and designs. Conceptual and methodological issues include: use of numerous HRQOL and QOL measures, lack of distinction between conceptualization and measurement of HRQL and QOL, lack of initial qualitative input from survivors about QOL, little examination of the influence of environmental factors on QOL, little attention to survivors' satisfaction with life quality, use of small heterogeneous samples, and need for population-based longitudinal studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-009-0660-0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDougall, J., & Tsonis, M.
Affiliations
  • Thames Valley Children's Centre (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
McDougall, Janette
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2009-06-02
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
1231-1246
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2091208519
Cited by
115
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Keywords
childhood cancer survivors, quality of life, health-related quality of life, physical well-being, psychological well-being, social well-being, age at diagnosis, treatment type, socioeconomic factors, gender differences, life satisfaction
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Social Support, Treatment Outcome, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review