The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A pilot study: dose adaptation of capecitabine using mobile phone toxicity monitoring — supporting patients in their homes
Abstract
Purpose Real-time symptom monitoring using a mobile phone is potentially advantageous for patients receiving oral chemotherapy. We therefore conducted a pilot study of patient dose adaptation using mobile phone monitoring of specific symptoms to investigate relative dose intensity of capecitabine, level of toxicity and perceived supportive care.Methods Patients with breast or colorectal cancer receiving capecitabine completed a symptom, temperature and dose diary twice a day using a mobile phone application. This information was encrypted and automatically transmitted in real time to a secure server, with moderate levels of toxicity automatically prompting self-care symptom management messages on the screen of the patient's mobile phone or in severe cases, a call from a specialist nurse to advise on care according to an agreed protocol.Results Patients (n = 26) completed the mobile phone diary on 92.6 % of occasions. Twelve patients had a maximum toxicity grade of 3 (46.2 %). The average dose intensity for all patients as a percentage of standard dose was 90 %. In eight patients, the dose of capecitabine was reduced, and in eight patients, the dose of capecitabine was increased. Patients and healthcare professionals involved felt reassured by the novel monitoring system, in particular, during out of hours.Conclusion It is possible to optimise the individual dose of oral chemotherapy safely including dose increase and to manage chemotherapy side effects effectively using real-time mobile phone monitoring of toxicity parameters entered by the patient.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A considerable number of included studies were feasibility or pilot studies, which restricted the strength of their results.
“Regarding the design and quality of the studies included in our study, a considerable number of studies were feasibility or pilot studies [25,32,33,41,43], which restricted the strength of their results.”
From Research-Tested Mobile Apps for Breast Cancer Care: Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
Cassidy, J., Clarke, S. J., Díaz‐Rubio, E., Scheithauer, W., Figer, A., Wong, R., Koski, S. L., Lichinitser, M., Yang, T., Rivera, F., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.14.9898 · Cited by 861
Conventional Compared with Individualized Chemotherapy for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Evans, W. E., Relling, M. V., Rodman, J. H., Crom, W. R., Boyett, J. M., & Pui, C. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199802193380803 · Cited by 489
Lyman, G. H., Dale, D. C., Friedberg, J. W., Crawford, J., & Fisher, R. I. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.03.213 · Cited by 315
Application of mobile phone technology for managing chemotherapy-associated side-effects
Weaver, A., Young, A., Rowntree, J., Townsend, N., Pearson, S., Smith, J., Gibson, O., Cobern, W., Larsen, M. E., & Tarassenko, L. (2007) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm354 · Cited by 148
Self-citationon behalf of the COIN trial TMG and investigators, Adams, R., Meade, A. M., et al. (2009) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604877 · Cited by 64
Dose Density in Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
Citron, M. L. (2004) · Cancer Investigation · doi:10.1081/cnv-200027134 · Cited by 32
Chang, H. J., Lee, K.-W., Kim, J. H., et al. (2011) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr329 · Cited by 28
Dose-dense chemotherapy for primary breast cancer
Kümmel, S., Rezai, M., Kimmig, R., et al. (2007) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/gco.0b013e328011f99a · Cited by 15
Brearley, S. G., Craven, O., Saunders, M. P., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01114.x · Cited by 10
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Research-Tested Mobile Apps for Breast Cancer Care: Systematic Review
Jongerius, C., Russo, S., Mazzocco, K., & Pravettoni, G. (2019) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/10930 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Weaver, A., Love, S. B., Larsen, M., Shanyinde, M., Waters, R., Grainger, L., Shearwood, V., Brooks, C., Gibson, O., Young, A. M., & Tarassenko, L.
- Affiliations
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Young, Annie M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2014-04-26
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2677-2685
- ISSN
- 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7339
- OpenAlex
- W2055653635
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Vodafone Foundation
- Cancer Research UK (16895)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (PB-PG-0212-27124)
- University of Oxford
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- capecitabine, dose adjustment, oral chemotherapy, chemotherapy toxicity, symptom monitoring, dose intensity, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, supportive care, real-time patient monitoring, dose escalation
- MeSH terms
- Capecitabine, Adult, Aged, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Breast Neoplasms, Deoxycytidine, Female, Fluorouracil, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Pilot Projects, Colorectal Neoplasms, Cell Phone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review