Cited by 43Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CarePain Management and Opioid Use

Association between the duration of palliative care service and survival in terminal cancer patients

Lee, Yong Joo, Yang, Jung-Hwa, Lee, Jung-Wook, Yoon, Johi, Nah, Jung-Ran, Choi, Whan-Seok, Kim, Chul-min·2015·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose Preliminary studies of early palliative care showed improved quality of life, less medical cost, and better survival time. But, most terminal cancer patients tend to be referred to palliative care late. For the proper care of terminal cancer patients, it is necessary to refer to hospice and palliative care timely. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the duration of palliative care services on the survival in terminal cancer patients.Methods We reviewed 609 patients who had died from terminal cancer between January 2010 and December 2012. We analyzed correlations of age, first Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) level, duration of palliative care service, and survival time. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for both univariate and multivariate analyses of survival.Results Duration of palliative care services was significantly correlated with survival time. In univariate Cox regression analysis, age, and each group of duration of palliative care service showed significant associations with survival. Final multivariate Cox regression model retained four parameters as independent prognostic factors for survival (age HR = 0.99 (p = 0.002), 1∼10 days HR = 2.64 (p < 0.001), 11∼30 days HR = 2.43 (p < 0.001), 31∼90 days HR = 1.87 (p < 0.001)).Conclusions Shorter duration of palliative care services showed poor prognostic factor. Timely referral system from the end of chemotherapy is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-014-2444-4

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, Y. J., Yang, J.-H., Lee, J.-W., Yoon, J., Nah, J.-R., Choi, W.-S., & Kim, C.-M.
Affiliations
Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Chul-min
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2014-10-04
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
1057-1062
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2084520852
Cited by
43
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
terminal cancer, survival, prognostic factors, early palliative care, Palliative Performance Scale, age, hospice care, end-of-life care
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Quality of Life, Referral and Consultation, Terminal Care, Time Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Survivors, Disease Progression, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review