Cited by 24Cancer-related cognitive impairment studiesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingCancer survivorship and care

Exploring the measurement properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in a population of people with cancer

Open access
Arcuri, Giovanni G., Palladini, Lisa, Dumas, Gabrielle, Lemoignan, Josée, Gagnon, Bruno·2015·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Background Cancer and cancer-related treatments are associated with a constellation of physical and psychological changes. Treatments associated with noncentral nervous system neoplasms can have short- and long-term effects on cognition, affecting quality of life in people with cancer. Clinical measurement tools specific to cancer-related mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are lacking. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has been validated in a geriatric population and used in studies assessing MCI in persons with cancer, but no studies have yet shown its psychometric properties when used with this population.Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore the psychometric properties of the MoCA within a population of persons with noncentral nervous system cancer.Methods A total of 74 participants were included from persons attending a Cancer Nutrition-Rehabilitation Program at the McGill University Health Centre. Rasch analyses were conducted.Results The MoCA data fit all the properties of the Rasch model with a person separation index of 1.04 and person reliability of 0.52. The MoCA items were found to measure a unidimensional construct and spanned 6.57 logits, with item difficulty levels between 2.49 and -4.08 logits. However, the MoCA presented a lack of items of higher difficulty, as person cognitive ability levels ranged from -0.51 to 5.17 logits.Conclusion Within the limits of a small sample size, the results of this exploratory study suggest the possibility that the MoCA, when used within a population of persons with cancer, may meet criteria for unidimensionality and adequate item fit but may present weaknesses when used with participants of higher cognitive abilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-015-2643-7

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The data were unidimensional enough to justify a single Rasch model containing all 14 items.

    “Although there are no set norms for determining unidimensionality (Linacre, 2012), because the eigenvalue for the first contrast in the residuals was < 3 (Arcuri et al., 2015) and there were no misfitting items (Bond & Fox, 2015), we present findings from an analysis with all items included in a single model.”

    From Coercive Control in the Courtroom: the Legal Abuse Scale (LAS) (2023) · cites this paper as Arcuri et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arcuri, G. G., Palladini, L., Dumas, G., Lemoignan, J., & Gagnon, B.
Affiliations
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Arcuri, Giovanni G.
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2015-02-14
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
2779-2787
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2085208429
Cited by
24
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
Montreal Cognitive Assessment, cancer-related cognitive impairment, psychometric properties, Rasch analysis, unidimensionality, item fit, cancer rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review