Cited by 17Digital Mental Health InterventionsCancer survivorship and careTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Acceptability of an internet cognitive behavioural therapy program for people with early-stage cancer and cancer survivors with depression and/or anxiety: thematic findings from focus groups

Karageorge, A., Murphy, M. J., Newby, J. M., Kirsten, L., Andrews, G., Allison, K., Loughnan, S., Price, M. +4 more·2017·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose We developed an eight-lesson internet-delivered CBT (iCBT) program targeting anxiety and depression in early-stage cancer and cancer survivors. To explore the acceptability of the program, we showed volunteers the first two lessons and asked for their views.Methods Focus groups (n = 3) and individual interviews (n = 5) were undertaken with 15 participants (11 survivors) with mainly breast (11 of the 15) cancer, who had reviewed intervention materials. Participants were asked to consider the acceptability of the iCBT program content and implementation design (timing, duration). Semi-structured questions guided discussion. Thematic analysis was conducted of participant reactions to the acceptability and/or suitability of materials created for use in a psychological intervention. We took a data-driven (inductive) approach to semantic theme development across the data set.Results Participants reported high acceptability of the internet delivery format, good engagement and user-friendly material. Participants were broadly supportive of combining depression and anxiety iCBT resources for early-stage cancer patients and survivors. Participants further indicated that a separate course would be needed to address the needs of patients with advanced stage disease.Conclusions Participants welcomed the general development of an internet-delivered CBT intervention program to treat patients with clinical depression and/or anxiety. Furthermore, the sessions reviewed were highly acceptable to all participants. Study findings informed researchers on the development of iCBT resources for the cancer community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-017-3617-8

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karageorge, A., Murphy, M. J., Newby, J. M., Kirsten, L., Andrews, G., Allison, K., Loughnan, S., Price, M., Shaw, J., Shepherd, H., Smith, J., & Butow, P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Murphy, M. J.
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2017-02-18
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
2129-2136
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2588171578
Cited by
17
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Institute NSW (14/TPG/1-02)
  • New South Wales Institute of Psychiatry (AU) (Research Fellow 2016)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1037797)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, early-stage cancer, cancer survivors, depression, anxiety, acceptability, breast cancer, psychological intervention, intervention development, user engagement, online mental health resources
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Behavior Therapy, Depression, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Focus Groups, Survivors, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review