Cited by 67Acupuncture Treatment Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Acupuncture for cancer-related fatigue in lung cancer patients: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial

Cheng, Chien-shan, Chen, Lian-yu, Ning, Zhou-yu, Zhang, Chen-yue, Chen, Hao, Chen, Zhen, Zhu, Xiao-yan, Xie, Jing·2017·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Background Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a distressing symptom that is the most common unpleasant side effect experienced by lung cancer patients and is challenging for clinical care workers to manage. Methods We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial to evaluate the clinical effect of acupuncture on CRF in lung cancer patients. Twenty-eight patients presenting with CRF were randomly assigned to active acupuncture or placebo acupuncture groups to receive acupoint stimulation (LI-4, Ren-6, St-36, KI-3, and Sp-6) twice per week for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcome was the change in intensity of CFR based on the Chinese version of the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI-C). As the secondary endpoint, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Cancer Subscale (FACT-LCS) was adopted to assess the influence of acupuncture on patients' quality of life (QOL). Adverse events and safety of treatments were monitored throughout the trial. Results Our pilot study demonstrated feasibility among patients with appropriate inclusion criteria and good compliance with acupuncture treatment. A significant reduction in the BFI-C score was observed at 2 weeks in the 14 participants who received active acupuncture compared with those receiving the placebo (P 0.05). Conclusion Fatigue is a common symptom experienced by lung cancer patients. Acupuncture may be a safe and feasible optional method for adjunctive treatment in cancer palliative…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-017-3812-7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, C.-S., Chen, L.-Y., Ning, Z.-Y., Zhang, C.-Y., Chen, H., Chen, Z., Zhu, X.-Y., & Xie, J.
Affiliations
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhu, Xiao-yan
  • Xie, Jing
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2017-07-13
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
3807-3814
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2735562361
Cited by
67
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Comprehensive and Integrative Medicine Institute
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81403248)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
acupuncture, cancer-related fatigue, lung cancer, sham acupuncture, Brief Fatigue Inventory, quality of life, palliative care, adjunctive therapy, acupoint stimulation, treatment safety
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Fatigue, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Acupuncture Points, Acupuncture Therapy, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review