Cited by 81Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchFamily Support in Illness

Do carer’s levels of unmet needs change over time when caring for patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma and how are these needs correlated with distress?

Open access
Halkett, G. K. B., Lobb, E. A., Shaw, T., Sinclair, M. M., Miller, L., Hovey, E., Nowak, A. K.·2018·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose The aim of the current study was to determine how carer needs changed longitudinally and understand associations between unmet needs and distress. Methods Family carers of patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) were recruited. Carers completed questionnaires during patients' chemoradiotherapy (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) including the following: the Distress Thermometer, the General Health Questionnaire-12, the Partner and Carer Supportive Care (PCS) Needs Scale and its supplement the Access to Services Needs Scale and the Brain Tumour Specific Supportive Care Needs Scale. Linear latent growth models were applied. Results The time 1 questionnaire was completed by 118 carers; 70 carers provided responses at time 3. While the mean numbers of elevated (moderate to high) needs remained stable over time, the specific needs changed. The most frequently reported PCS needs included the impact of caring on the carer's working life or usual activities, finding more accessible parking, making life decisions in the context of uncertainty, reducing stress in the patient's life and understanding the patient's experience. The most frequently reported need unique to carers of a brain tumour patient was for information on adjusting to cognitive changes in the patient. Other prominent needs included managing difficult aspects of the patient's behaviour and adjusting to changes in the patient's personality, both of which increased over time. Higher numbers of unmet needs were associated cross-sectionally with higher distress levels. Conclusion Carers of people with HGG remain highly distressed and their needs evolve over time, indicating a requirement for ongoing evaluation of unmet needs and interventions to address carer psychological morbidities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-017-3846-x

Cites

46 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caregiver needs fall into social, cognitive, and psychological categories.

    “These needs fall into social, cognitive, and psychological categories [2].”

    From Exploring the Unmet Needs of Cancer Caregivers in India: A Cross-Sectional Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Carer needs section describes work and social needs, psychological and emotional needs, and needs related to patients’ cognitive changes. It does not classify caregiver needs into the three categories stated: the supportive-care scale has four domains, and cognitive changes appear as an item in a separate brain-tumor-specific scale. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Keir S, Calhoun-Eagan R, Swartz U, Friedman H (2008) Screening for distress in patients with brain cancer Psychooncology 17 (6):621-625
  2. Halkett GK, Lobb EA, Shaw T, Sinclair MM, Miller L, Hovey E, Nowak AK (2016) Distress and psychological morbidity do not reduce over time in carers of patients with high-grade glioma. Support Care Cancer. doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3478-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halkett, G. K. B., Lobb, E. A., Shaw, T., Sinclair, M. M., Miller, L., Hovey, E., & Nowak, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
  • The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU)
  • Government of Western Australia Department of Health (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Halkett, G. K. B.
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2017-08-14
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
275-286
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2745344069
Cited by
81
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
family caregivers, high-grade glioma, unmet needs, caregiver distress, chemoradiotherapy, carer support services
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emotions, Empathy, Female, Glioma, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review