Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 29Head and Neck Cancer StudiesOral health in cancer treatmentCancer survivorship and care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical and sociodemographic factors that affect the quality of life of survivors of head and neck cancer

Abstract

Objective The present cross-sectional study evaluated the quality of life of patients treated with 3-D conformal radiotherapy for cancer of the mouth, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx and investigated possible associations with clinical and sociodemographic variables using multivariate analysis.Methods The sample was composed of 90 patients who had completed treatment at least 3 months earlier. Data were collected from April 2016 to May 2017. The patients were clinically evaluated with regard to stimulated salivary flow, trismus, and radiation caries. Sociodemographic data and data related to the disease (stage, location of primary tumor, and radiation dose) were collected from the patient charts. Quality of life was assessed using the Brazilian version of the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaire. Poisson logistic regression was performed to determine the mean ratio and test associations with the clinical and sociodemographic variables.Results The mean total of the UW-QOL was 814.88 (± 224.58). Patient age, staging of cancer, hyposalivation, and trismus were associated with quality of life. Patients with tumors in the advanced stage, those with hyposalivation and those with trismus respectively had 11% (CI 0.80-0.98), 12% (CI 0.79-0.99), and 15% (CI 0.77-0.94) lower UW-QOL scores, indicating poorer quality of life.Conclusion Survivors of head and neck cancer experience a negative impact on quality of life associated with trismus, hyposalivation, advanced stage tumors, and a younger patient age. The present findings underscore the importance of a specific approach focused on these aspects to ensure better quality of life in the long term.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-019-05008-4

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Bonzanini, L. I. L., Soldera, E. B., Ortigara, G. B., Schulz, R. E., Antoniazzi, R. P., Ardenghi, T. M., & Ferrazzo, K. L.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
Corresponding author
Bonzanini, Laura Izabel Lampert
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2019-08-02
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
1941-1950
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2966259289
Cited by
29
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Oral health in cancer treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
head and neck cancer survivors, quality of life, 3D conformal radiotherapy, hyposalivation, trismus, radiation caries, stimulated salivary flow, tumor stage, patient age, sociodemographic factors, oropharyngeal cancer, laryngeal cancer, hypopharyngeal cancer, oral cancer
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, Adult, Aged, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Radiation Injuries, Socioeconomic Factors, Trismus, Xerostomia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.