Caregivers in home palliative care: gender, psychological aspects, and patient’s functional status as main predictors for their quality of life
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to investigate the impact of possible predictors of quality of life (QoL) in a group of Italian caregivers assisting a cancer patient in home palliative care. Methods Data from 570 adult informal caregivers and their cancer-affected relatives were collected. A multivariate regression analysis was conducted to assess the effect of three groups of variables on Caregivers Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) scale: (a) socio-demographic characteristics of caregivers; (b) psychological characteristics of caregivers assessed by Profile Mood of States (POMS), Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), and Preparedness for Caregiving Scale (PCS); (c) Socio-demographic characteristics and functional status of the patients assessed by Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL). Results Regression analysis shows that some variables from each of these clusters are significantly associated with CQOLC, in particular: (a) the gender of the caregiver (st.β = .115, t = 2.765, p = .006) and the time spent for caregiving (st.β = - .165, t = - 3.960, p < .001); (b) the scores obtained by the caregivers in POMS,CBI (st.β = - .523, t = - 16.984, p < .001 and st.β = - .373, t = - 12.950, p < .001, respectively) and PCS (st.β = .092, t = 3.672, p < .001); (c) the gender (st.β = - .081, t = - 1.933, p = .045) and the IADL score (st.β = .195, t = 4.643, p < .001) of the patient. Conclusions A multidimensional evaluation is a key strategy to identify the most vulnerable caregivers. Apart from the condition of the patient, the gender of the caregivers, the time spent for caregiving and, above all, their psychological condition are strong predictors of caregivers' QoL.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Otras publicaciones reportan características similares en términos de sexo, relación con el paciente, ingresos económicos bajos (menores a USD 500) y un alto grado de compromiso del cuidador manifestado por el número de horas al día dedicadas a su atención.
“Otras publicaciones reportan características similares en términos de sexo, relación con el paciente, ingresos económicos bajos (menores a USD 500) (42-44) y un alto grado de compromiso del cuidador por atender a su familiar enfermo, manifestado por el número de horas al día dedicadas a su atención (45, 46).”
From Factores relacionados con sobrecarga del cuidador informal de pacientes con cáncer avanzado (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Franchini, L., Ercolani, G., Ostan, R., Raccichini, M., Samolsky-Dekel, A., Malerba, M. B., Melis, A., Varani, S., & Pannuti, R.
- Affiliations
- ANT Foundation Italy Onlus (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Franchini, L.
- Venue
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2019-11-13
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3227-3235
- ISSN
- 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7339
- OpenAlex
- W2987674714
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- informal caregivers, home-based palliative care, caregiver quality of life, cancer patients, caregiver gender, caregiver burden, caregiver preparedness, mood states, patient functional status, instrumental activities of daily living, caregiving time
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Female, Gender Identity, Home Nursing, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Sociological Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review