Cited by 84Economic and Financial Impacts of CancerCancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Correlates of financial toxicity in adult cancer patients and their informal caregivers

Open access
Sadigh, Gelareh, Switchenko, Jeffrey, Weaver, Kathryn E., Elchoufi, Deema, Meisel, Jane, Bilen, Mehmet Asim, Lawson, David, Cella, David +2 more·2022·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Background Financial toxicity is commonly reported by cancer patients, but few studies have assessed caregiver perceptions. We aimed to validate the modified Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) in cancer caregivers, identify factors associated with financial toxicity in both patients and caregivers, and assess the association of caregiver financial toxicity with patient and caregiver outcomes. Methods Using a convenience sampling method, 100 dyads of adult cancer patients and a primary caregiver visiting outpatient oncology clinics (Jan-Sep 2019) were recruited. We assessed the internal consistency and convergent and divergent validity of the modified COST. Multivariable analyses identified correlates of financial toxicity. Association of financial toxicity with care non-adherence, lifestyle-altering behaviors (e.g., home refinance/sale, retirement/saving account withdrawal), and quality of life (QOL) was investigated. Results Recruited patient vs. caregiver characteristics were as follows: mean age: 60.6 vs. 56.5; 34% vs. 46.4% female; 79% vs. 81.4% white. The caregiver COST measure demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.91). In patients, older age (B, 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-0.4]) and higher annual household income (B, 14.3 [95% CI, 9.3-19.4]) correlated with lower financial toxicity (P < 0.05). In caregivers, lower patient financial toxicity (B, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.2-0.6]) and cancer stages 1-3 (compared to stage 4) (B, 4.6 [95% CI, 0.4-8.8]) correlated with lower financial toxicity (P < 0.05). Increased caregiver financial toxicity correlated with higher care non-adherence in patients, increased lifestyle-altering behaviors, and lower QOL in patients and caregivers (P < 0.05). Conclusion The COST measure can also be used to assess caregiver financial toxicity. Caregivers' financial toxicity was associated with negative outcomes for both dyad members.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-021-06424-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 10 studies described financial problems of caregivers, resulting from costs associated with the disease, lack of financial support of other family members, or difficulty reconciling role as caregivers with work activity.

    “In the economic sphere, 10 studies [25,27,39,44,53,56,57] described the financial problems of people caregivers, resulting from the costs associated with the disease, the lack of financial support of other family members, or the difficulty of reconciling their role as caregivers with their work activity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [1]Yabroff KR, Zhao J, Zheng Z, Rai A, Han X (2018) Medical financial hardship among cancer survivors in the United States: what do we know? What do we need to know? Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 27: 1389– 1397. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0617 30429132 · DOI
  2. [2]Smith GL, Lopez-Olivo MA, Advani PG, Ning MS, Geng Y, Giordano SH, Volk RJ (2019) Financial burdens of cancer treatment: a systematic review of risk factors and outcomes. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17: 1184– 1192. 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7305 31590147 PMC7370695 · DOI
  3. [3]McLouth LE, Nightingale CL, Dressler EV, Snavely AC, Hudson MF, Unger JM, Kazak AE, Lee SJC, Edward J, Carlos R, Kamen CS, Neuman HB, Weaver KE (2020) Current practices for screening and addressing financial hardship within the National Cancer Institute’s Community Oncology Research Program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-115710.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1157 PMC8026561 33355237 · DOI
  4. [4]de Souza JA, Yap BJ, Wroblewski K, Blinder V, Araujo FS, Hlubocky FJ, Nicholas LH, O’Connor JM, Brockstein B, Ratain MJ, Daugherty CK, Cella D (2017) Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: the validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). Cancer 123: 476 27716900 PMC5298039
  5. [5]Ramsey SD, Bansal A, Fedorenko CR, Blough DK, Overstreet KA, Shankaran V, Newcomb P (2016) Financial insolvency as a risk factor for early mortality among patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 34: 980– 986. 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.6620 26811521 PMC4933128 · DOI
  6. [6]Schroder SL, Schumann N, Fink A, Richter M (2020) Coping mechanisms for financial toxicity: a qualitative study of cancer patients’ experiences in Germany. Support Care Cancer 28: 1131– 1139. 10.1007/s00520-019-04915-w 31201545 · DOI
  7. [7]Mejri N, Berrazega Y, Boujnah R, Rachdi H, El Benna H, Labidi S, Boussen H (2021) Assessing the financial toxicity in Tunisian cancer patients using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). Support Care Cancer 29: 4105– 4111. 10.1007/s00520-020-05944-6 33404807 · DOI
  8. [8]Longo CJ, Fitch MI, Loree JM, Carlson LE, Turner D, Cheung WY, Gopaul D, Ellis J, Ringash J, Mathews M, Wright J, Stevens C, D’Souza D, Urquhart R, Maity T, Balderrama F, Haddad E (2021) Patient and family financial burden associated with cancer treatment in Canada: a national study. Support Care Cancer 29: 3377– 3386. 10.1007/s00520-020-05907-x 33403399 PMC8062343 · DOI
  9. [9]Grunfeld E, Coyle D, Whelan T, Clinch J, Reyno L, Earle CC, Willan A, Viola R, Coristine M, Janz T, Glossop R (2004) Family caregiver burden: results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer patients and their principal caregivers. CMAJ 170: 1795– 1801 15184333 PMC419766
  10. [10]Maguire R, Hanly P, Hyland P, Sharp L (2018) Understanding burden in caregivers of colorectal cancer survivors: what role do patient and caregiver factors play? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 27. 10.1111/ecc.12527 27271848 · DOI
  11. [11]Carmichael F, Charles S (2003) The opportunity costs of informal care: does gender matter? J Health Econ 22: 781– 803. 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00044-4 12946459 · DOI
  12. [12]Heitmueller A (2007) The chicken or the egg? Endogeneity in labour market participation of informal carers in England. J Health Econ 26: 536– 559. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.005 17098311 · DOI
  13. [13]Hayman JA, Langa KM, Kabeto MU, Katz SJ, DeMonner SM, Chernew ME, Slavin MB, Fendrick AM (2001) Estimating the cost of informal caregiving for elderly patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 19: 3219– 3225. 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.13.3219 11432889 · DOI
  14. [14]Girgis A, Lambert S, Johnson C, Waller A, Currow D (2013) Physical, psychosocial, relationship, and economic burden of caring for people with cancer: a review. J Oncol Pract 9: 197– 202. 10.1200/JOP.2012.000690 23942921 PMC3710169 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [15]de Souza JA, Yap BJ, Hlubocky FJ, Wroblewski K, Ratain MJ, Cella D, Daugherty CK (2014) The development of a financial toxicity patient-reported outcome in cancer: the COST measure. Cancer 120: 3245– 3253. 10.1002/cncr.28814 24954526 · DOI
  16. [19]Minaya P, Baumstarck K, Berbis J, Goncalves A, Barlesi F, Michel G, Salas S, Chinot O, Grob JJ, Seitz JF, Bladou F, Clement A, Mancini J, Simeoni MC, Auquier P (2012) The CareGiver Oncology Quality of Life questionnaire (CarGOQoL): development and validation of an instrument to measure the quality of life of the caregivers of patients with cancer. Eur J Cancer 48: 904– 911. 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.010 22033328 · DOI
  17. [20]Cella DF, Jacobsen PB, Orav EJ, Holland JC, Silberfarb PM, Rafla S (1987) A brief POMS measure of distress for cancer patients. J Chronic Dis 40: 939– 942 3611291
  18. [21]Crowne DP, Marlowe D (1960) A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol 24: 349– 354. 10.1037/h0047358 13813058 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [22]Lown JM (2011) Development and validation of a financial self-efficacy scale. J Financ Couns Plan 22(54): 63
  20. [23]Yabroff KR, Dowling EC, Guy GP Jr, Banegas MP, Davidoff A, Han X, Virgo KS, McNeel TS, Chawla N, Blanch-Hartigan D, Kent EE, Li C, Rodriguez JL, de Moor JS, Zheng Z, Jemal A, Ekwueme DU (2016) Financial hardship associated with cancer in the United States: findings from a population-based sample of adult cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 34: 259– 267. 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.0468 26644532 PMC4872019 · DOI
  21. [24]Banegas MP, Guy GP Jr, de Moor JS, Ekwueme DU, Virgo KS, Kent EE, Nutt S, Zheng Z, Rechis R, Yabroff KR (2016) For working-age cancer survivors, medical debt and bankruptcy create financial hardships. Health Aff (Millwood) 35: 54– 61. 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0830 26733701 PMC6057727 · DOI
  22. [25]Pisu M, Kenzik KM, Oster RA, Drentea P, Ashing KT, Fouad M, Martin MY (2015) Economic hardship of minority and non-minority cancer survivors 1 year after diagnosis: another long-term effect of cancer? Cancer 121: 1257– 1264. 10.1002/cncr.29206 25564986 PMC4393356 · DOI
  23. [26]Veenstra CM, Regenbogen SE, Hawley ST, Griggs JJ, Banerjee M, Kato I, Ward KC, Morris AM (2014) A composite measure of personal financial burden among patients with stage III colorectal cancer. Med Care 52: 957– 962. 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000241 25304021 PMC4270346 · DOI
  24. [27]Watabayashi K, Steelquist J, Overstreet KA, Leahy A, Bradshaw E, Gallagher KD, Balch AJ, Lobb R, Lavell L, Linden H, Ramsey SD, Shankaran V (2020) A pilot study of a comprehensive financial navigation program in patients with cancer and caregivers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 18: 1366– 1373. 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7581 33022646 · DOI
  25. [29]Altice CK, Banegas MP, Tucker-Seeley RD, Yabroff KR (2017) Financial hardships experienced by cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 109. 10.1093/jnci/djw205 PMC6075571 27754926 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [30]Zafar SY, McNeil RB, Thomas CM, Lathan CS, Ayanian JZ, Provenzale D (2015) Population-based assessment of cancer survivors’ financial burden and quality of life: a prospective cohort study. J Oncol Pract 11(145): 150. 10.1200/JOP.2014.001542 PMC4371118 25515717 · DOI
  27. [31]Lathan CS, Cronin A, Tucker-Seeley R, Zafar SY, Ayanian JZ, Schrag D (2016) Association of financial strain with symptom burden and quality of life for patients with lung or colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 34: 1732– 1740. 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2232 26926678 PMC4966336 · DOI
  28. [32]Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Dura JR, Speicher CE, Trask OJ, Glaser R (1991) Spousal caregivers of dementia victims: longitudinal changes in immunity and health. Psychosom Med 53: 345– 362. 10.1097/00006842-199107000-00001 1656478 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [33]Mills PJ, Ziegler MG, Patterson T, Dimsdale JE, Hauger R, Irwin M, Grant I (1997) Plasma catecholamine and lymphocyte beta 2-adrenergic receptor alterations in elderly Alzheimer caregivers under stress. Psychosom Med 59: 251– 256. 10.1097/00006842-199705000-00008 9178336 · DOI
  30. [34]Schulz R, O’Brien AT, Bookwala J, Fleissner K (1995) Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of dementia caregiving: prevalence, correlates, and causes. Gerontologist 35: 771– 791. 10.1093/geront/35.6.771 8557205 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [35]Kurtz ME, Kurtz JC, Given CW, Given B (1995) Relationship of caregiver reactions and depression to cancer patients’ symptoms, functional states and depression—a longitudinal view. Soc Sci Med 40: 837– 846. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00249-s 7747219 · DOI
  32. [36]Clipp EC, Moore MJ (1995) Caregiver time use: an outcome measure in clinical trial research on Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther 58: 228– 236. 10.1016/0009-9236(95)90201-5 7648773 · DOI
  33. [37]Yun YH, Rhee YS, Kang IO, Lee JS, Bang SM, Lee WS, Kim JS, Kim SY, Shin SW, Hong YS (2005) Economic burdens and quality of life of family caregivers of cancer patients. Oncology 68: 107– 114. 10.1159/000085703 15886502 · DOI
  34. [38]Longacre ML, Applebaum AJ, Buzaglo JS, Miller MF, Golant M, Rowland JH, Given B, Dockham B, Northouse L (2018) Reducing informal caregiver burden in cancer: evidence-based programs in practice Transl. Behav Med 8: 145– 155. 10.1093/tbm/ibx028 PMC6257028 29385550 · DOI
  35. [39]Sadigh G, Gallagher K, Obenchain J, Benson A 3rd, Mitchell E, Sengupta S, Carlos RC (2019) Pilot feasibility study of an oncology financial navigation program in brain cancer patients. J Am Coll Radiol 16: 1420– 1424. 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.07.014 31585660 PMC6779332 · DOI
  36. [40]Shankaran V, Leahy T, Steelquist J, Watabayashi K, Linden H, Ramsey S, Schwartz N, Kreizenbeck K, Nelson J, Balch A, Singleton E, Gallagher K, Overstreet K (2018) Pilot feasibility study of an oncology financial navigation program. J Oncol Pract 14: e122– e129. 10.1200/JOP.2017.024927 29272200 · DOI
  37. [41]Henrikson NB, Lau RW, Tuzzio L, Christianson M, Phan TH, Chen E (2016) Treatment prices at the point of care in a clinical oncology service: pilot project. J Oncol Pract 12: e957– e963. 10.1200/JOP.2016.012997 27858569 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review

    Guerra-Martín, M. D., Casado-Espinosa, M. D. R., Gavira-López, Y., Holgado-Castro, C., López-Latorre, I., & Borrallo-Riego, Á. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20021570 · Cited by 80 · see citing works

    “, 2022 [56] (1) Validate the instrument Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) modified in non-professional caregivers of patients with cancer, (2) Identify factors associated with financial toxicity both in patients and caregivers, and (3) Evaluate the impact of financial toxicity in specific aspects of bo…”
    BackgroundInfluential

Authors
Sadigh, G., Switchenko, J., Weaver, K. E., Elchoufi, D., Meisel, J., Bilen, M. A., Lawson, D., Cella, D., El-Rayes, B., & Carlos, R.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Winship Cancer Institute (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Sadigh, Gelareh
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2021-07-13
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
217-225
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W3178062719
Cited by
84
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11
FWCI
9.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Association of University Radiologists
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
financial toxicity, cancer caregivers, informal caregivers, scale validation, caregiver burden, quality of life, household income, tumor stage, patient-caregiver dyads
MeSH terms
Financial Stress, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review