Cited by 528Cancer survivorship and careHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

General population and cancer patient norms for the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G)

Brucker, Penny S., Yost, Kathleen, Cashy, John, Webster, Kimberly, Cella, David·2005·Evaluation & the Health Professions

Abstract

Given the number of new cancer cases diagnosed each year and the increases in survival rates, the importance of having a clinically useful health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument has increased. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) is one such instrument that has been used worldwide to assess HRQOL. Previously, the use of the FACT-G had been limited because of a lack of published normative data. Normative data are useful for consumers to place their results in an appropriate context by comparing their scores of individuals or group of individuals to a reference group. Here, we present normative data for the FACT-G for two reference groups: (a) a sample of the general U.S. adult population and (b) a large, heterogeneous sample of adult patients with cancer. In addition, we demonstrate various uses of the normative data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0163278705275341

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brucker, P. S., Yost, K., Cashy, J., Webster, K., & Cella, D.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Brucker, Penny S.
Venue
Evaluation & the Health Professions
Published
2005-06
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
192-211
ISSN
  • 0163-2787 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3918
OpenAlex
W2019970875
Cited by
528
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 19
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evaluation & the Health Professions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
FACT-G, reference values, health-related quality of life, cancer patients, general population, reference groups, cancer survivorship, quality of life instruments
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reference Values, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review