Cited by 16Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchFamily Support in Illness

Factors associated with psychological distress in caregivers of patients with malignant gliomas

Forst, Deborah A., Podgurski, Alyx F., Quain, Kit M., Landay, Sophia L., Anand, Maya, Kaslow-Zieve, Emilia, Mesa, Michelle M., Jacobs, Jamie M. +8 more·2022·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose Caregivers of patients with malignant gliomas are at risk for psychological distress. However, factors associated with distress in this population have not been well described. We conducted a prospective study evaluating psychological distress in patients with malignant gliomas and their caregivers and exploring factors associated with caregiver distress. Methods We enrolled patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas (N = 77) and their caregivers (N = 61). At baseline and 3, 6, and 9 months after diagnosis, we administered the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to assess psychological distress and the Caregiver Reaction Assessment to evaluate caregiver burden. We performed multivariable regression analyses to investigate caregiver-related, patient-related, and tumor-related factors associated with caregivers' distress. Results At baseline, 48.3% (29/60) and 26.2% (16/61) of caregivers reported clinically significant anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively. Anxiety and depression symptoms persisted over time. Greater caregiver depression was associated with male gender (B = 1.48, 95% CI 0.16-2.81, p = 0.03), higher caregiver burden (B = 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.15, p = 0.02), caregiver anxiety (B = 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.68, p Conclusion Male gender, higher caregiver burden, greater patient depression symptoms, and younger patient age are associated with increased distress among caregivers of patients with malignant gliomas, underscoring the need for tailored sup…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-022-06989-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forst, D. A., Podgurski, A. F., Quain, K. M., Landay, S. L., Anand, M., Kaslow-Zieve, E., Mesa, M. M., Jacobs, J. M., Dietrich, J., Parsons, M. W., Horick, N., Greer, J. A., Batchelor, T. T., Jackson, V. A., El-Jawahri, A., & Temel, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Forst, Deborah A.
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2022-03-30
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
5811-5820
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W4220763982
Cited by
16
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology at Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
  • Cancer Outcomes Research and Education Program at Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
  • Dr. El-Jawahri is a Scholar in Clinical Research for the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
caregiver psychological distress, high-grade glioma, caregiver burden, caregiver depression, caregiver anxiety, patient depression, patient age, caregiver gender, family caregivers, supportive care
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, Anxiety, Depression, Glioma, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review