Cited by 13Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

NeuroCARE: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Psychological Intervention for Caregivers of Patients With Primary Malignant Brain Tumors

Forst, Deborah A., Podgurski, Alyx F., Strander, Sumita M., Whitman, Jessica D., Datta, Shibani, Pintro, Kedie, Horick, Nora K., Willis, Kelcie D. +5 more·2024·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose Caregivers of patients with primary malignant brain tumors (PMBT) experience significant psychological distress. We assessed the effect of a psychological intervention (NeuroCARE) on anxiety symptoms among PMBT caregivers. Methods We conducted a randomized trial of NeuroCARE versus usual care in PMBT caregivers with elevated anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score ≥5) within 6 months of the patient's diagnosis. NeuroCARE was developed for PMBT caregivers and consists of six telehealth sessions with a behavioral health specialist. Participants completed surveys at baseline, 11-week (postintervention), and 16-week (1-month postintervention) time points. The primary outcome was 11-week anxiety symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]-Anxiety Subscale). We also measured depression symptoms (HADS-Depression Subscale), quality of life (QOL; Caregiver QOL survey), caregiver burden (Caregiver Reaction Assessment), self-efficacy (Lewis Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale), coping (Measure of Current Status), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (PTSD Checklist for DSM-5). We conducted analysis of covariance and linear mixed-effects regression analyses to examine intervention effects on study outcomes. Results We enrolled 120 caregivers (60/group) between October 2019 and June 2022; 105 were evaluable for the primary outcome. At 11 weeks, NeuroCARE participants reported significantly lower anxiety symptoms than usual care participants ( M , 8.87 v 10.69…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.24.00065

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The observed differences in the sensitivity analysis subgroup may be clinically relevant.

    “We observed differences of small to moderate magnitude (Cohen d > .20) that may be clinically relevant, benefiting the intervention group at 24 weeks for caregiver anxiety”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forst, D. A., Podgurski, A. F., Strander, S. M., Whitman, J. D., Datta, S., Pintro, K., Horick, N. K., Willis, K. D., Sannes, T. S., Greer, J. A., El-Jawahri, A., Jacobs, J. M., & Temel, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • UMass Memorial Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2024-12-20
Volume
42
Issue
36
Pages
4252-4262
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4402581217
Cited by
13
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
primary malignant brain tumors, caregiver anxiety, caregiver depression, psychological intervention, telemedicine, caregiver burden, self-efficacy, coping, post-traumatic stress disorder, quality of life
MeSH terms
Psychosocial Intervention, Caregiver Burden, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Brain Neoplasms, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Telemedicine, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review