The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nurse-led telehealth interventions for symptom management in patients with cancer receiving systemic or radiation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Purpose Patients receiving cancer treatments experience many treatment-related symptoms. Telehealth is increasingly being used to support symptom management. The overall aim was to determine the effectiveness of nurse-led telehealth symptom management interventions for patients with cancer receiving systemic or radiation therapy compared to usual care on health service use, quality of life, and symptom severity. Methods A systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA reporting guidelines. Five electronic databases were searched. Two independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data. Meta-analysis was performed if data were clinically and methodologically homogeneous. Subanalysis was conducted on reactive and scheduled telehealth interventions. Results Of 7749 citations screened, 10 studies were included (8 randomized control trials, 2 quasi-experimental). Five were reactive telehealth interventions with patient-initiated contact and five evaluated scheduled telehealth interventions initiated by nurses. Compared to usual care (typically patient-initiated calls), nurse-led telehealth interventions for symptom management showed no statistically significant difference in hospitalizations, emergency department visits, or unscheduled clinic visits. Two of three studies of reactive telehealth interventions showed improved quality of life. All telehealth interventions showed reduction in the severity of most symptoms. Pain severity was significantly reduced (standard mean difference - 0.54; 95% CI - 0.88, - 0.19). Significant heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis for most outcomes. Conclusion Few studies evaluated nurse-led telehealth interventions for cancer symptom management. Compared to usual care, patients exposed to telehealth interventions had reduced symptom severity and no difference in health services use. Future research should focus on better reporting intervention characteristics and consistently measuring outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Systematic reviews have consistently shown that virtual care and remote symptom monitoring can improve access, patient satisfaction, symptom management, and continuity of care, particularly for rural and underserved populations.
“Systematic reviews have consistently shown that virtual care and remote symptom monitoring can improve access, patient satisfaction, symptom management, and continuity of care, particularly for rural and underserved populations”
From A Scoping Review of Implemented Innovations in Cancer Care: Implications for Pan-Canadian Scaling (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
The Discussion reports reduced symptom severity in several telehealth studies and says telehealth can shorten time to access care; the Introduction says patient-reported symptom alerts have been shown to improve satisfaction. The review does not establish improved continuity of care or particular benefits for rural and underserved populations, and its Discussion notes methodological limitations and mixed results rather than consistently demonstrated benefits. Page numbers were not supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
Sterne, J. A., Hernán, M. A., Reeves, B. C., Savović, J., Berkman, N. D., Viswanathan, M., Henry, D., Altman, D. G., Ansari, M. T., Boutron, I., et al. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919 · Cited by 20,329
Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Welch, V., Kristjansson, E., et al. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j4008 · Cited by 10,636
Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687 · Cited by 10,548
Basch, E., Deal, A. M., Kris, M. G., Scher, H. I., Hudis, C. A., Sabbatini, P., Rogak, L., Bennett, A. V., Dueck, A. C., Atkinson, T. M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.0830 · Cited by 2,593 · cited 9×
“Three of these studies reported ED visits [17, 39, 43], three reported hospitalizations [17, 38, 43], and two reported unscheduled clinic visits [39, 43].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe impact of mHealth interventions: systematic review of systematic reviews
Marcolino, M. S., Oliveira, J. A. Q., D'Agostino, M., Ribeiro, A. L., Alkmim, M. B. M., & Novillo-Ortiz, D. (2018) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.8873 · Cited by 1,163
Agboola, S. O., Ju, W., Elfiky, A., Kvedar, J. C., & Jethwani, K. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4009 · Cited by 132
Chen, Y.-Y., Guan, B.-S., Li, Z.-K., & Li, X.-Y. (2018) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x16686777 · Cited by 118
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer
Ream, E., Hughes, A. E., Cox, A., Skarparis, K., Richardson, A., Pedersen, V. H., Wiseman, T., Forbes, A., & Bryant, A. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007568.pub2 · Cited by 113
Mosher, C. E., Winger, J. G., Hanna, N., Jalal, S. I., Einhorn, L. H., Birdas, T. J., Ceppa, D. P., Kesler, K. A., Schmitt, J., Kashy, D. A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.04.006 · Cited by 91
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- Macartney G, Stacey D, Carley M, Harrison MB (2012) Priorities, barriers and facilitators for remote support of cancer symptoms: a survey of Canadian oncology nurses. Can Oncol Nurs J 22:235–240. https://doi.org/10.5737/1181912x224235240 · DOI
- Stark L, Tofthagen C, Visovsky C, McMillan SC (2012) The symptom experience of patients with cancer. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 14:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0b013e318236de5c · DOI
- Foltran L, Aprile G, Pisa FE, Ermacora P, Pella N, Iaiza E, Poletto E, Lutrino SE, Mazzer M, Giovannoni M, Cardellino GG, Puglisi F, Fasola G (2014) Risk of unplanned visits for colorectal cancer outpatients receiving chemotherapy: a case-crossover study. Support Care Cancer 22:2527–2533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2234-z · DOI
- Vandyk AD, Harrison MB, Macartney G, Ross-White A, Stacey D (2012) Emergency department visits for symptoms experienced by oncology patients: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 20:1589–1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1459-y · DOI
- Enright K, Grunfeld E, Yun L, Moineddin R, Ghannam M, Dent S, Eisen A, Trudeau M, Kaizer L, Earle C, Krzyzanowska MK (2015) Population-based assessment of emergency room visits and hospitalizations among women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 11:126–132. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2014.001073 · DOI
- Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Brenner H (2006) A population-based study of the impact of specific symptoms on quality of life in women with breast cancer 1 year after diagnosis. Cancer 107:2496–2503. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22274 · DOI
- Livingston PM, Craike M, Considine J (2011) Unplanned presentations to emergency departments due to chemotherapy induced complications: opportunities for improving service delivery. Australas Emerg Nurs J 14:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aenj.2011.03.005 · DOI
- Prip A, Møller KA, Nielsen DL, Jarden M, Olsen M-H, Danielsen AK (2018) The patient-healthcare professional relationship and communication in the oncology outpatient setting: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs 41:E11–E22. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000533 · DOI
- Koonin LM, Hoots B, Tsang CA, Leroy Z, Farris K, Jolly T, Antall P, McCabe B, Zelis CBR, Tong I, Harris AM (2020) Trends in the use of telehealth during the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic - United States, January-March 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69:1595–1599. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6943a3 · DOI
- Mooney KH, Beck SL, Wong B, Dunson W, Wujcik D, Whisenant M, Donaldson G (2017) Automated home monitoring and management of patient-reported symptoms during chemotherapy: results of the symptom care at home RCT. Cancer Med 6:537–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1002 · DOI
- Foster C, Grimmett C, May CM, Ewings S, Myall M, Hulme C, Smith PW, Powers C, Calman L, Armes J, Breckons M, Corner J, Fenlon D, Batehup L, Lennan E, May CR, Morris C, Neylon A, Ream E, Turner L, Yardley L, Richardson A (2016) A web-based intervention (RESTORE) to support self-management of cancer-related fatigue following primary cancer treatment: a multi-centre proof of concept randomised controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 24:2445–2453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3044-7 · DOI
- Galiano-Castillo N, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernández-Lao C, Ariza-García A, Díaz-Rodríguez L, Del-Moral-Ávila R, Arroyo-Morales M (2016) Telehealth system: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of an internet-based exercise intervention on quality of life, pain, muscle strength, and fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Cancer 122:3166–3174. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30172 · DOI
- Jibb LA, Stevens BJ, Nathan PC, Seto E, Cafazzo JA, Johnston DL, Hum V, Stinson JN (2017) Implementation and preliminary effectiveness of a real-time pain management smartphone app for adolescents with cancer: a multicenter pilot clinical study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 64:.https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26554 · DOI
- Weaver A, Young A, Rowntree J, Townsend N, Pearson S, Smith J, Gibson O, Cobern W, Larsen M, Tarassenko L (2007) Application of mobile phone technology for managing chemotherapy-associated side-effects. Ann Oncol 18:1887–1892. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdm354 · DOI
- Basch E, Artz D, Dulko D, Scher K, Sabbatini P, Hensley M, Mitra N, Speakman J, McCabe M, Schrag D (2005) Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:3552–3561. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.04.275 · DOI
- Chen J, Ou L, Hollis SJ (2013) A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting. BMC Health Serv Res 13:211. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-211 · DOI
- Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LDV, Aaronson NK (2002) Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:3027–3034. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.23.3027 · DOI · Paper page
- Stacey D, Carley M, Kohli J, Skrutkowski M, Avery J, Bazile AM, Court A, Nagel DA, Budz D (2014) Remote symptom support training programs for oncology nurses in Canada: an environmental scan. Can Oncol Nurs J 24:78–88. https://doi.org/10.5737/1181912x2427882 · DOI
- Moss EL (2014) “Just a telephone call away”: transforming the nursing profession with telecare and telephone nursing triage. Nurs Forum 49:233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12052 · DOI
- Lai XB, Ching SSY, Wong FKY, Leung CWY, Lee LH, Wong JSY, Lo YF (2019) A nurse-led care program for breast cancer patients in a chemotherapy day center: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs 42:20–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000539 · DOI
- Stacey D, Green E, Ballantyne B, Skrutkowski M, Whynot A, Tardif L, Tarasuk J, Carley M, Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) Team (2016) Patient and family experiences with accessing telephone cancer treatment symptom support: a descriptive study. Supportive Care Cancer 24:893–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2859-6 · DOI
- Gustavell T, Sundberg K, Segersvärd R, Wengström Y, Langius-Eklöf A (2019) Decreased symptom burden following surgery due to support from an interactive app for symptom management for patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer. Acta Oncol 58:1307–1314. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1633473 · DOI
- Kroenke K, Theobald D, Wu J, Norton K, Morrison G, Carpenter J, Tu W (2010) Effect of telecare management on pain and depression in patients with cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 304:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.944 · DOI
- Dickinson R, Hall S, Sinclair JE, Bond C, Murchie P (2014) Using technology to deliver cancer follow-up: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 14:311. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-311 · DOI · Paper page
- Moradian S, Voelker N, Brown C, Liu G, Howell D (2018) Effectiveness of Internet-based interventions in managing chemotherapy-related symptoms in patients with cancer: a systematic literature review. Support Care Cancer 26:361–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3900-8 · DOI
- Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, PRISMA-P Group (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 350:g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647 · DOI · Paper page
- Covidence systematic review software. Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia
- Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savović J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JAC (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928 · DOI · Paper page
- Bouleftour W, Muron T, Guillot A, Tinquaut F, Rivoirard R, Jacquin J-P, Saban-Roche L, Boussoualim K, Tavernier E, Augeul-Meunier K, Collard O, Mery B, Pupier S, Oriol M, Bourmaud A, Fournel P, Vassal C (2021) Effectiveness of a nurse-led telephone follow-up in the therapeutic management of patients receiving oral antineoplastic agents: a randomized, multicenter controlled trial (ETICCO study). Supportive Care Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05955-3 · DOI
- Cirillo M, Carlucci L, Legramandi L, Baldini E, Sacco C, Zagonel V, Leo S, Di Fabio F, Tonini G, Meacci ML, Tartarone A, Farci D, Tortora G, Zaninelli M, Valori VM, Cinieri S, Carrozza F, Barbato E, Fabbroni V, Cretella E, Gamucci T, Lunardi G, Zamboni S, Micallo G, Cascinu S, Pinto C, Gori S (2020) Oral anticancer therapy project: clinical utility of a specific home care nursing programme on behalf of Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM). J Clin Nurs 29:119–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15064 · DOI
- Hintistan S, Nural N, Cilingir D, Gursoy A (2017) Therapeutic effects of nurse telephone follow-up for lung cancer patients in Turkey. Cancer Nurs 40:508–516. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000461 · DOI
- Kornblith AB, Dowell JM, Herndon JE 2nd, Engelman BJ, Bauer-Wu S, Small EJ, Morrison VA, Atkins J, Cohen HJ, Holland JC (2006) Telephone monitoring of distress in patients aged 65 years or older with advanced stage cancer: a cancer and leukemia group B study. Cancer 107:2706–2714. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22296 · DOI
- Traeger L, McDonnell TM, McCarty CE, Greer JA, El-Jawahri A, Temel JS (2015) Nursing intervention to enhance outpatient chemotherapy symptom management: patient-reported outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 121:3905–3913. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29585 · DOI
- Yount SE, Rothrock N, Bass M, Beaumont JL, Pach D, Lad T, Patel J, Corona M, Weiland R, Del Ciello K, Cella D (2014) A randomized trial of weekly symptom telemonitoring in advanced lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 47:973–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.07.013 · DOI
- Beaver K, Hollingworth W, McDonald R, Dunn G, Tysver-Robinson D, Thomson L, Hindley AC, Susnerwala SS, Luker K (2009) Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial of hospital versus telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer. Br J Surg 96:1406–1415. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6753 · DOI
- Sirintrapun SJ, Lopez AM (2018) Telemedicine in cancer care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 38:540–545. https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_200141 · DOI
- Forkner-Dunn J (2003) Internet-based patient self-care: the next generation of health care delivery. J Med Internet Res 5:e8. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5.2.e8 · DOI
- Bhavnani SP, Narula J, Sengupta PP (2016) Mobile technology and the digitization of healthcare. Eur Heart J 37:1428–1438. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv770 · DOI
- Kim BY, Lee J (2017) Smart devices for older adults managing chronic disease: a scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 5:e69. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7141 · DOI · Paper page
- Cleeland CS, Wang XS, Shi Q, Mendoza TR, Wright SL, Berry MD, Malveaux D, Shah PK, Gning I, Hofstetter WL, Putnam JB, Vaporciyan AA (2011) Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 29:994–1000. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.8315 · DOI · Paper page
- Yun YH, Lee KS, Kim Y-W, Park SY, Lee ES, Noh D-Y, Kim S, Oh JH, Jung SY, Chung K-W, Lee YJ, Jeong S-Y, Park KJ, Shim YM, Zo JI, Park JW, Kim YA, Shon EJ, Park S (2012) Web-based tailored education program for disease-free cancer survivors with cancer-related fatigue: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 30:1296–1303. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.37.2979 · DOI
- Stacey D, Skrutkowski M, Carley M, Kolari E, Shaw T, Ballantyne B (2015) Training oncology nurses to use remote symptom support protocols: a retrospective pre-/post-study. Oncol Nurs Forum 42:174–182. https://doi.org/10.1188/15.ONF.174-182 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Scoping Review of Implemented Innovations in Cancer Care: Implications for Pan-Canadian Scaling
Sampalli, T., Tomblin Murphy, G., Peacock, S., Navaratnam, S., Domm, D., & MacKenzie, K. (2026) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol33070395
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwok, C., Degen, C., Moradi, N., & Stacey, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Stacey, Dawn
- Venue
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2022-04-14
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 7119-7132
- ISSN
- 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7339
- PMC
- PMC9008678
- OpenAlex
- W4223917247
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Ottawa
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- cancer symptom management, systemic therapy, radiotherapy, health care utilization, quality of life, symptom severity, pain intensity, hospitalization, emergency department visits
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Self Care, Telemedicine, Nurse's Role
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review