Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors participating in a pilot randomized controlled trial of a web-based dietary intervention with text messages

Wang, Lufan, Langlais, Crystal, Kenfield, Stacey A., Van Loon, Katherine, Laffan, Angela, Atreya, Chloe E., Chan, June M., Zhang, Li, Allen, Isabel E., Miaskowski, Christine, Fukuoka, Yoshimi, Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A., Venook, Alan P., Van Blarigan, Erin L.·2023·Supportive Care in Cancer
DOI 10.1007/s00520-023-07620-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to estimate the effect of a 12-week web-based dietary intervention with text messages on quality of life (QoL) among colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Methods: Between 2017 and 2018, 50 CRC survivors were randomized (1:1) to receive a 12-week web-based dietary intervention with daily text messages or wait-list control. Health-related QoL was assessed using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire–Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and colorectal quality of life module (QLQ-CR29) at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks. Within- and between-group mean changes in health-related QoL with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for both arms. Results: Compared to the controls, participants receiving the intervention had an improvement in emotional functioning (mean change: 14.3; 95% CI: 3.0, 25.6) at 12 weeks and social functioning (mean change: 13.8; 95% CI: 2.1, 25.5) at 24 weeks. A decrease of fatigue from baseline was also observed in the intervention arm (mean change: − 9.1; 95% CI: − 17.1, − 1.1) at 24 weeks. No other changes in QoL scores were associated with the intervention. Conclusion: CRC survivors randomized to receive a web-based dietary intervention with text messages experienced higher emotional and social functioning. Further study with a larger population may be warranted. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02965521. Registered 16 November 2016,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/keydates/NCT02965521

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-023-07620-x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A (2022) Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 72(1):7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21708 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Harrington CB, Hansen JA, Moskowitz M, Todd BL, Feuerstein M (2010) It’s not over when it’s over: long-term symptoms in cancer survivors—a systematic review. Int J Psychiatry Med 40(2):163–181 · DOI
  3. Gernier F, Joly F, Klein D, Mercier M, Velten M, Licaj I (2020) Cancer-related fatigue among long-term survivors of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer: a French registry–based controlled study. Support Care Cancer 28(12):5839–5849 · DOI
  4. Inhestern L, Beierlein V, Bultmann JC et al (2017) Anxiety and depression in working-age cancer survivors: a register-based study. BMC Cancer 17(1):347 · DOI
  5. Han CJ, Yang GS, Syrjala K (2020) Symptom experiences in colorectal cancer survivors after cancer treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Nurs 43(3):E132–E158 · DOI
  6. Denlinger CS, Barsevick AM (2009) The challenges of colorectal cancer survivorship. Robinson KG, ed. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7(8):883–894 · DOI
  7. Nguyen TH, Chokshi RV (2020) Low anterior resection syndrome. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 22(10):48 · DOI
  8. Sturiale A, Martellucci J, Zurli L et al (2017) Long-term functional follow-up after anterior rectal resection for cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 32(1):83–88 · DOI
  9. Chen TYT, Wiltink LM, Nout RA et al (2015) Bowel function 14 years after preoperative short-course radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer 14(2):106–114 · DOI
  10. LeMasters T, Madhavan S, Sambamoorthi U, Kurian S (2013) A population-based study comparing HRQoL among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors to propensity score matched controls, by cancer type, and gender: HRQoL of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors. Psychooncology 22(10):2270–2282 · DOI
  11. Arndt V, Merx H, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Brenner H (2004) Quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer 1 year after diagnosis compared with the general population: a population-based study. JCO 22(23):4829–4836 · DOI
  12. Balhareth A, Aldossary MY, McNamara D (2019) Impact of physical activity and diet on colorectal cancer survivors’ quality of life: a systematic review. World J Surg Onc 17(1):153 · DOI
  13. Van Blarigan EL, Meyerhardt JA (2015) Role of physical activity and diet after colorectal cancer diagnosis. JCO 33(16):1825–1834 · DOI
  14. Meyerhardt JA, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D et al (2007) Association of dietary patterns with cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. JAMA 298(7):754–764 · DOI
  15. Kassianos AP, Raats MM, Gage H, Peacock M (2015) Quality of life and dietary changes among cancer patients: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 24(3):705–719 · DOI
  16. Gigic B, Boeing H, Toth R et al (2018) Associations between dietary patterns and longitudinal quality of life changes in colorectal cancer patients: the ColoCare Study. Nutr Cancer 70(1):51–60 · DOI
  17. Van Blarigan EL, Fuchs CS, Niedzwiecki D et al (2018) Association of survival with adherence to the American Cancer Society nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors after colon cancer diagnosis: the CALGB 89803/Alliance Trial. JAMA Oncol 4(6):783 · DOI
  18. Kenkhuis MF, van Duijnhoven FJB, van Roekel EH et al (2022) Longitudinal associations of fiber, vegetable, and fruit intake with quality of life and fatigue in colorectal cancer survivors up to 24 months post-treatment. Am J Clin Nutr 115(3):822–832 · DOI
  19. El-Shami K, Oeffinger KC, Erb NL et al (2015) American Cancer Society colorectal cancer survivorship care guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 65(6):428–455 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Grimmett C, Bridgewater J, Steptoe A, Wardle J (2011) Lifestyle and quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 20(8):1237–1245 · DOI
  21. Blanchard CM, Courneya KS, Stein K (2008) Cancer survivors’ adherence to lifestyle behavior recommendations and associations with health-related quality of life: results from the American Cancer Society’s SCS-II. JCO 26(13):2198–2204 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Ho M, Ho JWC, Fong DYT et al (2020) Effects of dietary and physical activity interventions on generic and cancer-specific health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression in colorectal cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. J Cancer Surviv 14(4):424–433 · DOI
  23. Cadmus-Bertram L, Wang JB, Patterson RE, Newman VA, Parker BA, Pierce JP (2013) Web-based self-monitoring for weight loss among overweight/obese women at increased risk for breast cancer: the HELP pilot study. Psychooncology 22(8):1821–1828 · DOI
  24. Simpson SA, Matthews L, Pugmire J et al (2020) An app-, web- and social support-based weight loss intervention for adults with obesity: the HelpMeDoIt! feasibility RCT. NIHR Journals Library. Accessed February 8, 2022. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555017/ · DOI
  25. Coughlin SS, Whitehead M, Sheats JQ, Mastromonico J, Hardy D, Smith SA (2015) Smartphone applications for promoting healthy diet and nutrition: a literature review. Jacobs J Food Nutr 2(3):021
  26. Lumpkins CY, Mabachi N, Lee J, Pacheco C, Greiner KA, Geana M (2017) A prescription for internet access: appealing to middle-aged and older racial and ethnic minorities through social network sites to combat colorectal cancer. Health Commun 32(7):916–920 · DOI
  27. Van Blarigan EL, Kenfield SA, Chan JM et al (2020) Feasibility and acceptability of a web-based dietary intervention with text messages for colorectal cancer: a randomized pilot trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 29(4):752–760 · DOI
  28. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Gujral S, Conroy T, Fleissner C et al (2007) Assessing quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: an update of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Cancer 43(10):1564–1573 · DOI
  30. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A, on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group (2001) The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd Edition). Published by: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels
  32. Whistance RN, Conroy T, Chie W et al (2009) Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45(17):3017–3026 · DOI
  33. Morgan MA (2009) Cancer survivorship: history, quality-of-life issues, and the evolving multidisciplinary approach to implementation of cancer survivorship care plans. Oncol Nurs Forum 36(4):429–436 · DOI
  34. Shaw RD, Ivatury SJ (2021) Late and long-term symptom management in colorectal cancer survivorship. Dis Colon Rectum 64(12):1447–1450 · DOI
  35. Vardy J, Dhillon HM, Pond GR et al (2014) Cognitive function and fatigue after diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 25(12):2404–2412 · DOI
  36. Winkels RM, van Lee L, Beijer S et al (2016) Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research lifestyle recommendations in colorectal cancer survivors: results of the PROFILES registry. Cancer Med 5(9):2587–2595 · DOI
  37. Rees-Punia E, Leach CR, Westmaas JL, et al. Pilot randomized controlled trial of feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a web-based physical activity and sedentary time intervention for survivors of physical inactivity-related cancers. Int J Behav Med. Published online May 6, 2021 · DOI
  38. Koontz BF, Levine E, McSherry F et al (2021) Increasing physical activity in Cancer Survivors through a Text-messaging Exercise motivation Program (ICanSTEP). Support Care Cancer 29(12):7339–7349 · DOI
  39. Robertson MC, Lyons EJ, Liao Y, Baum ML, Basen-Engquist KM (2020) Gamified text messaging contingent on device-measured steps: randomized feasibility study of a physical activity intervention for cancer survivors. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8(11):e18364 · DOI
  40. Job JR, Eakin EG, Reeves MM, Fjeldsoe BS (2021) Evaluation of the healthy living after cancer text message-delivered, extended contact intervention using the RE-AIM framework. BMC Cancer 21(1):1081 · DOI
  41. Lynch BM, Nguyen NH, Moore MM et al (2019) A randomized controlled trial of a wearable technology-based intervention for increasing moderate to vigorous physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior in breast cancer survivors: the ACTIVATE Trial. Cancer 125(16):2846–2855 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Mcneil J, Brenner DR, Stone CR et al (2019) Activity tracker to prescribe various exercise intensities in breast cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 51(5):930–940 · DOI
  43. Cairo J, Williams L, Bray L, Goetzke K, Perez AC (2020) Evaluation of a mobile health intervention to improve wellness outcomes for breast cancer survivors. J Patient Cent Res Rev 7(4):313–322 · DOI
  44. Phillips SM, Penedo FJ, Collins LM, et al. Optimization of a technology-supported physical activity promotion intervention for breast cancer survivors: results from Fit2Thrive. Cancer. Published online November 23, 2021 · DOI
  45. Chan JM, Van Blarigan EL, Langlais CS et al (2020) Feasibility and acceptability of a remotely delivered, web-based behavioral intervention for men with prostate cancer: four-arm randomized controlled pilot trial. J Med Internet Res 22(12):e19238 · DOI
  46. Sajid S, Dale W, Mustian K et al (2016) Novel physical activity interventions for older patients with prostate cancer on hormone therapy: a pilot randomized study. J Geriatr Oncol 7(2):71–80 · DOI
  47. Kenfield SA, Van Blarigan EL, Ameli N et al (2019) Feasibility, acceptability, and behavioral outcomes from a technology-enhanced behavioral change intervention (Prostate 8): a pilot randomized controlled trial in men with prostate cancer. Eur Urol 75(6):950–958 · DOI
  48. Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G et al (2012) Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Eur J Cancer 48(11):1713–1721 · DOI
  49. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A et al (2020) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70(3):145–164 · DOI
  50. Aycock DM, Hayat MJ, Helvig A, Dunbar SB, Clark PC (2018) Essential considerations in developing attention control groups in behavioral research. Res Nurs Health 41(3):320–328 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., Langlais, C., Kenfield, S. A., Van Loon, K., Laffan, A., Atreya, C. E., Chan, J. M., Zhang, L., Allen, I. E., Miaskowski, C., Fukuoka, Y., Meyerhardt, J. A., Venook, A. P., & Van Blarigan, E. L.
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-02-10
Volume
31
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0941-4355
  • 1433-7339
DOI
10.1007/s00520-023-07620-x
Cited by
6
References
5
Language
en
Licence
Funders
National Institutes of Health (K07CA197077)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.