Cited by 5Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsCancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and management

Nurse-led support impact via a mobile app for breast cancer patients after surgery: a quasi-experimental study (step 2)

Open access
Aydin, Aydanur, Gürsoy, Ayla·2024·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Breast cancer patients may experience some health issues following surgery. Training patients about self-care plays a vital role in managing these symptoms. Mobile applications are a contemporary and appropriate approach to support patients about the potential symptoms following breast cancer surgery. This quasi-experimental study aimed to assess the impact of nurse-led support mobile application (NL-Mapp) delivered on breast cancer patients after surgery. Ninety participants were recruited, with 45 assigned to the intervention group and 45 to the control group. Subjects in the intervention group received NL-Mapp in addition to routine care, while those in the control group received only routine care over four weeks. The intervention included educational content on the postoperative period of breast cancer. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (M 0), before discharge (M 1), and one month after surgery (M 2). The intervention group patients had significantly improved pain, affected shoulder functions, and anxiety owing to the effects of group, time, and group-time interaction. Body image and sexual adjustment were enhanced based on time and group-time interaction effects. During the follow-up period, experimental group patients experienced an improvement in body image and sexual adjustment, while those in the control group showed a decrease. This suggests that NL-Mapp may play a significant role in training breast cancer patients to manage their symptoms after surgery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-024-08819-2

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aydin, A., & Gürsoy, A.
Affiliations
Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Gürsoy, Ayla
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2024-08-20
Volume
32
Issue
9
Pages
598-598
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W4401729287
Cited by
5
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Gümüşhane University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
SANERC (2019/4)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
breast cancer, postoperative care, patient self-care, postoperative pain, shoulder function, anxiety, body image, sexual adjustment, symptom management, digital health interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Image, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review