The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Communicating prognosis to patients with metastatic disease: what do they really want to know?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Communicating with realism and hope: incurable cancer patients' views on the disclosure of prognosis
Hagerty, R. G., Butow, P. N., Ellis, P. M., Lobb, E. A., Pendlebury, S. C., Leighl, N., Mac Leod, C., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.11.138 · Cited by 582
Self-citationCommunicating prognosis in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature
Hagerty, R. G., Butow, P. N., Ellis, P. M., Dimitry, S., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2005) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi211 · Cited by 504
Self-citationCancer Patient Preferences for Communication of Prognosis in the Metastatic Setting
Hagerty, R. G., Butow, P. N., Ellis, P. A., Lobb, E. A., Pendlebury, S., Leighl, N., Goldstein, D., Lo, S. K., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.04.095 · Cited by 503
Self-citationThe communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review
Hack, T. F., Degner, L. F., & Parker, P. A. (2005) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.949 · Cited by 398
Advanced cancer patients’ prognostic information preferences: a review
Innes, S., & Payne, S. (2009) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216308098799 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Butow, P., Dowsett, S., Hagerty, R., & Tattersall, M.
- Venue
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-168
- ISSN
- 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7339
- OpenAlex
- W2045539433
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communicating prognosis to patients with metastatic disease: what do they really want to know? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s005200100290
- The paper
- Butow, P., Dowsett, S., Hagerty, R., & Tattersall, M. (2002). Communicating prognosis to patients with metastatic disease: what do they really want to know? Supportive Care in Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005200100290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
