The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer Patient Preferences for Communication of Prognosis in the Metastatic Setting
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To identify preferences for and predictors of prognostic information among patients with incurable metastatic cancer. Patients and Methods: One hundred twenty-six metastatic cancer patients seeing 30 oncologists at 12 outpatient clinics in New South Wales, Australia, participated in the study. Patients were diagnosed with incurable metastatic disease within 6 weeks to 6 months of recruitment. Patients completed a survey eliciting their preferences for prognostic information, including type, quantity, mode, and timing of presentation; anxiety and depression levels; and information and involvement preferences. Results: More than 95% of patients wanted information about side effects, symptoms, and treatment options. The majority wanted to know longest survival time with treatment (85%), 5-year survival rates (80%), and average survival (81%). Words and numbers were preferred over pie charts or graphs. Fifty-nine percent (59%) wanted to discuss expected survival when first diagnosed with metastatic disease. Thirty-eight percent and 44% wanted to negotiate when expected survival and dying, respectively, were discussed. Patients with higher depression scores were more likely to want to know shortest time to live without treatment (P = .047) and average survival (P = .049). Lower depression levels were significantly associated with never wanting to discuss expected survival (P = .03). Patients with an expected survival of years were more likely to want to discuss life expectancy when first diagnosed with metastases (P = .02). Conclusion: Most metastatic cancer patients want detailed prognostic information but prefer to negotiate the extent, format, and timing of the information they receive from their oncologists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000) · doi:10.1002/0471722146 · Cited by 20,302
The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., Haug, T. T., & Neckelmann, D. (2002) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3 · Cited by 9,779
Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences
Weeks, J. C. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.279.21.1709 · Cited by 1,319
Information Needs and Decisional Preferences in Women With Breast Cancer
Degner, L. F. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540420081039 · Cited by 1,136
Ethnicity and Attitudes Toward Patient Autonomy
Blackhall, L. J. (1995) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530100060035 · Cited by 1,011
Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres
Jenkins, V, Fallowfield, L., & Saul, J. (2001) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1573 · Cited by 845
Changes in Physicians' Attitudes Toward Telling the Cancer Patient
Novack, D. H. (1979) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1979.03290350017012 · Cited by 707
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kaplowitz SA, Osuch JR, Safron D, et al: Physician communication with seriously ill cancer patients: Results of a survey of physicians, in de Vries B (ed): End of Life Issues: Interdisciplinary and multidimensional perspectives . New York, Springer Publishing Company, pp 205,1999-227
- 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.977 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.977
Cited by
Wright, A. A. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.300.14.1665 · Cited by 2,788
Communication About Serious Illness Care Goals: A Review and Synthesis of Best Practices
Bernacki, R. E., & Block, S. D. (2014) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271 · Cited by 1,422
Solano, J. P., Gomes, B., & Higginson, I. J. (2006) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.06.007 · Cited by 1,191
Communicating with realism and hope: incurable cancer patients' views on the disclosure of prognosis
Hagerty, R. G., Butow, P. N., Ellis, P. M., Lobb, E. A., Pendlebury, S. C., Leighl, N., Mac Leod, C., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.11.138 · Cited by 582
Self-citationEnzinger, A. C., Zhang, B., Schrag, D., & Prigerson, H. G. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.61.9239 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagerty, R. G., Butow, P. N., Ellis, P. A., Lobb, E. A., Pendlebury, S., Leighl, N., Goldstein, D., Lo, S. K., & Tattersall, M. H. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1721-1730
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2152819888
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 14.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Patient Preferences for Communication of Prognosis in the Metastatic Setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.04.095
- The paper
- Hagerty, R. G., Butow, P. N., Ellis, P. A., Lobb, E. A., Pendlebury, S., Leighl, N., Goldstein, D., Lo, S. K., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2004). Cancer Patient Preferences for Communication of Prognosis in the Metastatic Setting. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.04.095
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.