Cited by 84Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionText and Document Classification TechnologiesSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Abusive language detection from social media comments using conventional machine learning and deep learning approaches

Akhter, Muhammad Pervez, Jiangbin, Zheng, Naqvi, Irfan Raza, AbdelMajeed, Mohammed, Zia, Tehseen·2022·Multimedia Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00530-021-00784-8

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding the context of text or images increases the chance of providing better accuracy.

    “In addition, understanding the context of the text or images increases the chance of providing better accuracy [19-23].”

    From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akhter, M. P., Jiangbin, Z., Naqvi, I. R., AbdelMajeed, M., & Zia, T.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
Corresponding author
Akhter, Muhammad Pervez
Venue
Multimedia Systems
Published
2021-04-01
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
1925-1940
ISSN
  • 0942-4962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1882
OpenAlex
W3147144921
Cited by
84
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Multimedia Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61972321)
  • Research and Development Plan of Shaanxi Province (2017ZDXM-GY-094, 2015KTZDGY04-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
offensive language detection, cyberbullying, social media comments, Urdu language, Roman Urdu, convolutional neural networks, LSTM, bidirectional long short-term memory, text classification, machine learning vs deep learning comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review