Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 586

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical diagnostic criteria of autoimmune pancreatitis: revised proposal

Open access
Okazaki, Kazuichi, Kawa, Shigeyuki, Kamisawa, Terumi, Naruse, Satoru, Tanaka, Shigeki, Nishimori, Isao, Ohara, Hirotaka, Ito, Tetsuhide, Kiriyama, Seiki, Inui, Kazuro, Shimosegawa, Tooru, Koizumi, Masaru, Suda, Koichi, Shiratori, Keiko, Yamaguchi, Koji, Yamaguchi, Taketo, Sugiyama, Masanori, Otsuki, Makoto·2006·Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

In 1961, Sarles et al. 1 asked the following question regarding the particular cases of pancreatitis with hypergammaglobulinemia: “Chronic inflammatory sclerosis of the pancreas—an autoimmune pancreatic disease?” As similar cases were rarely observed, a relationship between such pancreatitis and autoimmunity was viewed skeptically during the following several decades. In 1992, Toki et al. 2 have reported 4 cases with unusual diffuse irregular narrowing of the main pancreatic duct and diffuse enlargement of the entire pancreas due to lymphocyte infiltration. In 1995, Japanese investigators 3 firstly proposed a concept of “autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP)”, in which the patients showed diffusely enlarged pancreas, narrowing pancreatogram, increased serum IgG, presence of autoantibodies, fibrotic changes with lymphocytic infiltration and steroidal efficacy. Thereafter, many AIP cases have been reported from Japan, and AIP has been accepted as a new clinical entity. 4 , 5 The histopathological findings of AIP show massive infiltration of lymphoplasmacytes with fibrosis, which is consistent with lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP). 6 Many Japanese investigators have paid great attention to AIP, especially with regard to its unique pancreatic images, 2 IgG4, 7 disease-associated autoantibodies, 8 extrapancreatic lesions, 6 , 9 – 14 and steroidal efficacy. 14 , 15

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00535-006-1868-0

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 586

Metadata

Authors
Okazaki, K., Kawa, S., Kamisawa, T., Naruse, S., Tanaka, S., Nishimori, I., Ohara, H., Ito, T., Kiriyama, S., Inui, K., Shimosegawa, T., Koizumi, M., Suda, K., Shiratori, K., Yamaguchi, K., Yamaguchi, T., Sugiyama, M., & Otsuki, M.
Venue
Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2006-06
Volume
41
Issue
7
Pages
626-31
ISSN
  • 0944-1174 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5922
OpenAlex
W2082621274
Cited by
586
References
14
FWCI
32.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical diagnostic criteria of autoimmune pancreatitis: revised proposal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00535-006-1868-0
The paper
Okazaki, K., Kawa, S., Kamisawa, T., Naruse, S., Tanaka, S., Nishimori, I., Ohara, H., Ito, T., Kiriyama, S., Inui, K., Shimosegawa, T., Koizumi, M., Suda, K., Shiratori, K., Yamaguchi, K., Yamaguchi, T., Sugiyama, M., & Otsuki, M. (2006). Clinical diagnostic criteria of autoimmune pancreatitis: revised proposal. Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-006-1868-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.