Cited by 42Animal health and immunologyVeterinary Medicine and SurgerySepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Using haematological and serum biochemical findings as prognostic indicators in calf diarrhoea

Seifi, H. A., Mohri, M., Shoorei, E., Farzaneh, N.·2006·Comparative Clinical Pathology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00580-006-0620-8

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seifi, H. A., Mohri, M., Shoorei, E., & Farzaneh, N.
Affiliations
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (IR)
Corresponding author
Seifi, H. A.
Venue
Comparative Clinical Pathology
Published
2006-07-28
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
143-147
ISSN
  • 0938-7714 (ISSN-L)
  • 1618-5641
  • 1618-565X
OpenAlex
W1986845813
Cited by
42
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Comparative Clinical Pathology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
calf diarrhea, prognostic factors, survival prediction, hematological parameters, serum biochemistry, blood urea nitrogen, serum potassium, creatinine, hematocrit, Holstein calves, risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review