CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 124Spine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review

Open access
van Tulder, Maurits W., Koes, Bart, Seitsalo, Seppo, Malmivaara, Antti·2006·European Spine Journal
DOI 10.1007/s00586-005-1049-5PMC PMC3454546
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Within the framework of evidence-based medicine high-quality randomised trials and systematic reviews are considered a necessary prerequisite for progress in orthopaedics. This paper summarises the currently available evidence on surgical and other invasive procedures for low back pain. Results of systematic reviews conducted within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group were used. Data were gathered from the latest Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. The Cochrane reviews were updated using the evidence summary on surgery and other invasive procedures from the COST B13 European Guidelines for the Management of Acute and Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain. Facet joint, epidural, trigger point and sclerosant injections have not clearly been shown to be effective and can consequently not be recommended. There is no scientific evidence on the effectiveness of spinal stenosis surgery. Surgical discectomy may be considered for selected patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc prolapses that fail to resolve with the conservative management. Cognitive intervention Combined with exercises is recommended for chronic low back pain, and fusion surgery may be considered only in carefully selected patients after active rehabilitation programmes during 2 years time have failed. Demanding surgical fusion techniques are not better than the traditional posterolateral fusion without internal fixation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00586-005-1049-5

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 112 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ejeskar A, Nachemson A, Herberts P, Lysell E, Andersson G, Irstam L, Peterson LE (1983) Surgery versus chemonucleolysis for herniated lumbar discs. A prospective study with random assignment. Clin Orthop 174:236–242
  2. Lilius G, Lassonen AM, Myllynen P, Harilainen A, Salo L (1989) The lumbar facet joint syndrome––significance of inappropriate signs. A randomized, placebo controlled trial. French J Orthop Surg 3:479–486
  3. Rogers P, Nash T, Schiller D, Norman J (1992) Epidural steroids for sciatica. Pain Clin 5:67–72

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 124

Related

Metadata

Authors
van Tulder, M. W., Koes, B., Seitsalo, S., & Malmivaara, A.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Tekonivelsairaala Orton (FI)
ORCID
Venue
European Spine Journal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
15
Issue
S1
Pages
S82-S92
ISSN
  • 0940-6719 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0932
DOI
10.1007/s00586-005-1049-5
PMC
PMC3454546
OpenAlex
W2095078135
Cited by
124
References
112
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • European Spine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
low back pain, sciatica, invasive treatment, spinal surgery, epidural injection, facet joint injection, trigger point injection, sclerosant injection, spinal stenosis surgery, discectomy, lumbar disc herniation, cognitive intervention, physical activity, spinal fusion, posterolateral fusion, rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Radiofrequency Therapy, Humans, Injections, Spinal, Intervertebral Disc Displacement, Sciatica, Spinal Osteophytosis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review