The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outcome measures in chronic low back pain
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this prospective, single site cohort quasi-experimental study was to determine the responsiveness of the numerical rating scale (NRS), Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), Oswestry disability index (ODI), pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ) and the patient-specific functional scale (PSFS) in order to determine which would best measure clinically meaningful change in a chronic low back pain (LBP) population. Several patient-based outcome instruments are currently used to measure treatment effect in the chronic LBP population. However, there is a lack of consensus on what constitutes a "successful" outcome, how an important improvement/deterioration has been defined and which outcome measure(s) best captures the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions for the chronic LBP population. Sixty-three consecutive patients with chronic LBP referred to a back exercise and education class participated in this study; 48 of the 63 patients had complete data. Five questionnaires were administered initially and after the 5-week back class intervention. Also at 5 weeks, patients completed a global impression of change as a reflection of meaningful change in patient status. Score changes in the five different questionnaires were subjected to both distribution- and anchor-based methods: standard error of measurement (SEM) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to define clinical improvement. From these methods, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defined as the smallest difference that patients and clinicians perceive to be worthwhile is presented for each instrument. Based on the SEM, a point score change of 2.4 in the NRS, 5 in the RMDQ, 17 in the ODI, 11 on the PSEQ, and 1.4 on the PSFS corresponded to the MCID. Based on ROC curve analysis, a point score change of 4 points for both the NRS and RMDQ, 8 points for the ODI, 9 points for the PSEQ and 2 points for the PSFS corresponded to the MCID. The ROC analysis demonstrated that both the PSEQ and PSFS are responsive to clinically important change over time. The NRS was found to be least responsive. The exact value of the MCID is not a fixed value and is dependent on the assessment method used to calculate the score change. Based on ROC curve analysis the PSFS and PSEQ were more responsive than the other scales in measuring change in patients with chronic LBP following participation in a back class programme. However, due to the small sample size, the lack of observed worsening of symptoms over time, the single centre and intervention studied these results which need to be interpreted with caution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The minimum clinically important differences in pain scores before and after treatment are reported to range from 1.50 to 3.20 points [37,38].”
From The Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Adjunct on Stabilization Splint Treatment in Temporomandibular Joint Anterior Disc Displacement with Reduction Disorder: A Quantitative Analysis, Pilot Study (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The minimal clinically important difference for pain has been reported to range from 1.5 to 3.2 points.30 -34”
From Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Therapeutic Exercise for Temporomandibular Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, two studies of the PSEQ in people with low back pain suggest a change of greater than 5.5 20 or 8.5 21 points constitutes a MCID.”
From A service evaluation to examine the effectiveness of chronic pain management programmes delivered using video conferencing technology compared to in-person (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 · Cited by 10,764
Fairbank, J. C. T., & Pynsent, P. B. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017 · Cited by 5,851
Farrar, J. T., Young, J. P., LaMoreaux, L., Werth, J. L., & Poole, M. R. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00349-9 · Cited by 5,808
Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1989) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6 · Cited by 4,982
Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Katz, N. P., Kerns, R. D., Stucki, G., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., et al. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012 · Cited by 3,732
Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Turk, D. C., Dworkin, R. H., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., Brandenburg, N., Carr, D. B., Cleeland, C., Dionne, R., Farrar, J. T., Galer, B. S., et al. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.001 · Cited by 3,510
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Wyrwich, K. W., Beaton, D., Cleeland, C. S., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Kerns, R. D., Ader, D. N., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005 · Cited by 3,471 · cited 5×
“Patient global impression of change (PGIC) has been recommended by IMMPACT [19] for use in chronic pain clinical trials as a core outcome measure of global improvement with treatment and has been extensively used as a comparison in much of the literature regarding responsiveness.”
BackgroundInfluentialA Study of the Natural History of Back Pain: Part I
ROLAND, M., & MORRIS, R. (1983) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004 · Cited by 3,395
Ostelo, R. W. J. G., Deyo, R. A., Stratford, P., Waddell, G., Croft, P., Von Korff, M., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2008) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e31815e3a10 · Cited by 2,009
When to use agreement versus reliability measures
de Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015 · Cited by 1,801
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Beaton D, Tarasuk V, Katz J et al (2001) Are you better? A qualitative study into the meaning of being better and its implications for health status measurement. Arthritis Rheumatol 42(supplement):S274
- Nicholas M (1989) Self-efficacy and chronic pain. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Psychological Society, St. Andrews
- Department of Health (2008) High quality care for all—NHS next stage review final report, section 4. Quality at the heart of everything we do, Crown Copyright, The Stationery Office, p 47. http://www.tsoshop.co.uk
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chiarotto, A., Maxwell, L. J., Ostelo, R., Boers, M., Tugwell, P., & Terwee, C. B. (2018) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.07.009 · Cited by 780
Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)
Wright, A. A., Hannon, J., Hegedus, E. J., & Kavchak, A. J. E. (2012) · Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy · doi:10.1179/2042618612y.0000000001 · Cited by 559
Horn, K. K., Jennings, S., Richardson, G., van Vliet, D., Hefford, C., & Abbott, J. H. (2011) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3727 · Cited by 459
Armijo-Olivo, S., Pitance, L., Singh, V., Neto, F., Thie, N., & Michelotti, A. (2016) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20140548 · Cited by 413
Sedaghat, A. R. (2019) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/0194599819852604 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Maughan, E. F., & Lewis, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Guy's Hospital (GB)
- St George's, University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Maughan, Elaine F.
- ORCID
- Lewis, Jeremy S.
- Venue
- European Spine Journal
- Published
- 2010-04-17
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1484-1494
- ISSN
- 0940-6719 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0932
- PMC
- PMC2989277
- OpenAlex
- W2090368954
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Spine Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- chronic low back pain, outcome measures, minimal clinically important difference, numerical rating scale, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Patient-Specific Functional Scale, responsiveness to change, global impression of change, standard error of measurement, ROC curve, disability assessment, pain self-efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, ROC Curve, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Low Back Pain, Area Under Curve, Recovery of Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
