Cited by 3,395Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyPregnancy-related medical research

A Study of the Natural History of Back Pain: Part I

ROLAND, MARTIN, MORRIS, RICHARD·1983·Spine

Abstract

One of the problems in mounting a trial of treatment of back pain is the lack of suitable outcome measures. This paper describes the development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure selfrated disability due to back pain. The questionnaire is short, simple, sensitive, and reliable. It would be suitable for use in future trials of treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ROLAND, M., & MORRIS, R.
Affiliations
St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
ROLAND, MARTIN
Venue
Spine
Published
1983-03
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
141-144
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118516436
Cited by
3,395
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 136 · 2021: 148 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 128 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 130 · 2015: 125 · 2014: 127 · 2013: 145 · 2012: 146
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Spine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
back pain, natural history (disease), self-rated disability, questionnaire development, outcome measures, disability assessment, treatment trials
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Back Pain, Disability Evaluation, Humans, Middle Aged, Movement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review