Cited by 57Bone health and osteoporosis researchMedical Imaging and AnalysisScoliosis diagnosis and treatment

Assessment of bone quality at the lumbar and sacral spine using CT scans: a retrospective feasibility study in 50 comparing CT and DXA data

Open access
Berger-Groch, J., Thiesen, D. M., Ntalos, D., Hennes, F., Hartel, M. J.·2020·European Spine Journal

Abstract

Purpose: Computed tomography (CT) is a standard diagnostic tool for preoperative screening for many indications in spinal and pelvic surgery. The gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis is standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements not only at the lower lumbar, but also at the sacral spine using standard CT scans. Patients and methods: Main inclusion criterion for this retrospective analysis in 50 patients was the availability of both a CT scan of the lumbar and sacral spines and a DXA scan. HUs were measured in intact vertebral bodies L4, L5 and S1. Results of the HU in CT scan were compared to the T -score and bone mineral density in DXA. A group with normal bone density ( T -score higher − 1, n = 26) was compared with a group with impaired bone density ( T -score lower − 1, n = 24). Results: A multivariant binary logistic regression analysis showed significant results for HU measurement in L4 ( p = 0.009), L5 ( p = 0.005) and S1 ( p = 0.046) with respect to differentiation between normal and impaired bone quality. Cutoffs between normal and impaired bone density values for trabecular region of interest attenuation for L4, L5 and S1 are presented. In L4 100% sensitivity to detect normal bone was reached when HU was higher than 161, HU higher than 157 in L5 and HU higher than 207 in S1. Conclusions: HU measurements in CT scans have proven to be a feasible tool to additionally assess bone quality at the lumbar and sacral spine with good sensitivity, when compared with the gold standard DXA. Level of evidence: III. Graphic abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00586-020-06292-z

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DXA manifests strength in assessment of bone mass and density, thus simultaneously providing the conditions of bone, muscle, and fat.

    “Moreover, it also manifests strength in assessment of bone mass and density, thus simultaneously providing the conditions of bone, muscle, and fat (130, 131).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berger-Groch, J., Thiesen, D. M., Ntalos, D., Hennes, F., & Hartel, M. J.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Berger-Groch, J.
Venue
European Spine Journal
Published
2020-01-18
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
1098-1104
ISSN
  • 0940-6719 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0932
OpenAlex
W2998736445
Cited by
57
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Spine Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
bone quality, Hounsfield units, lumbar spine, sacral spine, osteoporosis, bone mineral density, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, trabecular bone, diagnostic accuracy, preoperative screening
MeSH terms
Feasibility Studies, Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review