Frequency of self-monitoring blood glucose and attainment of HbA1c target values
Open accessAbstract
Aims Test strips for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) represent in Argentina, around 50 % of diabetes treatment cost; the frequency of their use is closely associated with hyperglycemia treatment. However, the favorable impact of SMBG on attainment of HbA1c goal in different treatment conditions remains controversial. We therefore attempted to estimate the relationship between use of SMBG test strips and degree of attainment of metabolic control in an institution of our social security subsector (SSS) in which provision is fully covered and submitted to a regular audit system. Methods Observational retrospective study using information of 657 patients with T2DM (period 2009-2010) from the database of the Diabetes and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors Program (DICARO) of one institution of our SSS. DICARO provides-with an audit system-100 % coverage for all drugs and keeps records of clinical, metabolic and treatment data from every patient. Results The average monthly test strips/patient used for SMBG increased as a function of treatment intensification: Monotherapy with oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD) Conclusions In our population, the type of hyperglycemia treatment was the main driver of test strip use for SMBG; in every condition tested, targeted HbA1c values were associated with greater strip use. Patient education and prescription audit may optimize its use and treatment outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a retrospective analysis, frequency of blood glucose monitoring has been shown to predict A1C levels.
“Frequency of BGM (in a retrospective analysis) has been shown to be predictive of A1C levels.142–146”
From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [143]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 36 · Cited by 51
- Authors
- Elgart, J. F., González, L., Prestes, M., Rucci, E., & Gagliardino, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Corresponding author
- Gagliardino, Juan J.
- Venue
- Acta Diabetologica
- Published
- 2015-04-05
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-62
- ISSN
- 0940-5429 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-5233
- OpenAlex
- W2084204099
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- sedici.unlp.edu.ar
- Licence
- Locations
- Acta Diabetologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- self-monitoring of blood glucose, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, oral antidiabetic drugs, insulin therapy, treatment intensification, prescription drug costs, prescription review, patient education, social security health system
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Care Planning, Retrospective Studies, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review