Cited by 62Analytical chemistry methods developmentElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Determination of traces of lead and cadmium using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry

Rivas, Ricardo E., López-García, Ignacio, Hernández-Córdoba, Manuel·2009·Microchimica Acta

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00604-009-0206-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 62

Authors
Rivas, R. E., López-García, I., & Hernández-Córdoba, M.
Affiliations
Universidad de Murcia (ES)
Venue
Microchimica Acta
Published
2009-08-20
Volume
166
Issue
3-4
Pages
355-361
ISSN
  • 0026-3672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-5073
OpenAlex
W2026301597
Cited by
62
References
32
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Microchimica Acta (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
lead determination, cadmium determination, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate, graphite atomizer, trace metal analysis, water samples, seawater, bottled water, tap water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review