Cited by 122Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decision-making on an explicit risk-taking task in preadolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Drechsler, R., Rizzo, P., Steinhausen, H.-C.·2008·Journal of Neural Transmission

Abstract

Inappropriate risk-taking and disadvantageous decision-making have been described as major behavioural characteristics of patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However these behaviours are difficult to measure in laboratory contexts and recent studies have yielded inconsistent results which might be related to task characteristics. The present study adopted the Game of Dice Task, a test procedure in which risks are made explicit and the load on working memory is minimal. As a result, preadolescents with ADHD (N = 23) made significantly more risky choices and suffered major losses of money compared to normal controls (N = 24) but only when they played the game a second time. Differences in risk-taking correlated significantly with hyperactivity as rated by parents and with inhibitory control, but not with working memory performance. The results are discussed in the context of current theories of ADHD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00702-007-0814-5

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 44 references

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. RA Barkley, 2006, Attention-deficit/hyperactity disorder
  2. RK Heaton, 2000, WCST-64: computer version 2
  3. J Swanson, 1992, School-based assessments and interventions for ADD students

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–120 of 120

Metadata

Authors
Drechsler, R., Rizzo, P., & Steinhausen, H.-C.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Drechsler, R.
Venue
Journal of Neural Transmission
Published
2007-09-21
Volume
115
Issue
2
Pages
201-209
ISSN
  • 0300-9564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1463
OpenAlex
W2079702865
Cited by
122
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Transmission (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, risk-taking, decision-making, preadolescents, Game of Dice Task, hyperactivity, inhibitory control, working memory
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Behavior, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Risk-Taking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review