Cited by 9Atmospheric Ozone and ClimateAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics

Daily, seasonal, and annual characteristics of UV radiation and its influencing factors in Tõravere, Estonia, 2004–2016

Aun, Margit, Eerme, K., Ansko, I., Aun, M.·2019·Theoretical and Applied Climatology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00704-019-02865-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trend estimates of ultraviolet irradiance showed no significant difference during study periods.

    “The authors substantiated this by reporting that trend estimates of ultraviolet irradiance showed no significant difference during study periods”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aun, M., Eerme, K., Ansko, I., & Aun, M.
Affiliations
Tartu Observatory (EE)
Venue
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Published
2019-04-29
Volume
138
Issue
1-2
Pages
887-897
ISSN
  • 0066-6424 (ISSN-L)
  • 0177-798X
  • 1434-4483
OpenAlex
W2943227485
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Theoretical and Applied Climatology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Keywords
ultraviolet radiation, seasonal variation, annual variation, ozone column, aerosol optical depth, global radiation, cloud cover

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review