Cited by 17Science Education and PerceptionsChemistry Education and ResearchHistory and advancements in chemistry

Chemophobia versus the identity of chemists: heroes of chemistry as an effective communication strategy

Open access
Chalupa, Radek, Nesměrák, Karel·2020·Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly

Abstract

Abstract Decades of chemophobia are taking a high toll on chemistry. As current surveys suggest, people are displaying an irrational desire to live in a world without chemistry, but at the same time are unable to answer trivial chemistry questions. Constant questioning of the importance of chemistry induced by chemophobia leads to a weakening of the identity of chemists and can have negative consequences on the reproduction of chemistry. The need for the support of a positive perception of the chemical profession and an offer of positive examples for self-identification is the result. Everyday communication thus becomes the background on which the determination of the identity of the chemist takes place. The new communication strategy, which we call "heroes of chemistry", aims not only to add a much-needed human touch to chemistry communications, but also to create the conditions for strengthening the identity of the chemist.Graphic abstract

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00706-020-02633-2

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [7]Freud EL Letters of Sigmund Freud 1960 New York Basic Books
  2. [16]Jensen WB Memoirs of an amateur chemist 2013 Cincinnati The Epicurean Press
  3. [43]Goethals GR, Allison ST (2012) In: Olson JM, Zanna MP (eds), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 46. Academic Press, Cambridge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chalupa, R., & Nesměrák, K.
Affiliations
Charles University (CZ)
Corresponding author
Chalupa, Radek
Venue
Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly
Published
2020-06-08
Volume
151
Issue
8
Pages
1193-1201
ISSN
  • 0026-9247 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-4475
OpenAlex
W3034298909
Cited by
17
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Univerzita Karlova v Praze (Progress Q46)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Chemistry Education and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › History and advancements in chemistry
Keywords
chemophobia, science communication, public perception of chemistry, chemistry profession, everyday communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review