Cited by 23Menstrual Health and DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The role of emotion regulation in the experience of menstrual symptoms and perceived control over anxiety-related events across the menstrual cycle

Open access
Manikandan, Sanjana, Nillni, Yael I., Zvolensky, Michael J., Rohan, Kelly J., Carkeek, Krystle R., Leyro, Teresa M.·2016·Archives of Women s Mental Health

Abstract

Hormonal variation throughout the menstrual cycle is posited to impact various physical and mental health symptoms; however, this is not observed in all women and mechanisms are not well understood. Difficulty in emotion regulation may elucidate differences that women experience in physical and mental health functioning between menstrual phases. We examined the moderating role of difficulty in emotion regulation in the relation between menstrual phase and menstrual symptom severity and perceived control over anxiety-related events, in healthy, regularly menstruating women. The participants were 37 women (M age = 26.5, SD = 9.6). A series of regression analyses were used to examine whether individual differences in emotion regulation difficulties moderate the relation between menstrual phase and our outcomes, severity of menstrual symptoms and perceived control over anxiety-related events, using a within-subjects design. The analyses revealed that difficulty in emotion regulation significantly moderated the relation between menstrual phase and perceived control over anxiety-related events (β = -0.42, p < .05), but not menstrual symptom severity. Women who reported higher emotion regulation difficulty experienced greater differences in perceived control over anxiety-related events between menstrual phases. Specifically, women with lower difficulty in emotion regulation report greater increase in control over anxiety during the late luteal phase compared to women with higher emotion regulation difficulty. Difficulty in emotion regulation may play an important role in understanding differences in menstrual phase-associated impairments, thereby informing the development of targeted interventions for vulnerable women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-016-0661-1

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manikandan et al. (2016) concluded that it is each woman's emotional regulation capacity, and not her menstrual cycle phase, that determines her ability to control stress/anxiety.

    “Similarly, Manikandan et al. (2016) concluded that it is each woman's emotional regulation capacity, and not her menstrual cycle phase, that determines her ability to control stress/anxiety.”

    From The relationship between the menstrual cycle and cortisol secretion: Daily and stress-invoked cortisol patterns (2018) · cites this paper as Manikandan et al. (2016)

    The Discussion reports that women with less difficulty regulating emotions perceived greater control over anxiety-related events in both phases, and that there was no average main effect of phase. But it also reports a phase-dependent increase in perceived control among those women. The study measured perceived control, not an ability to control stress or anxiety, so the claim's exclusive and causal wording overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First M, Spitzer R, Gibbon M, Williams J (1994) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders-nonpatient edition Biometrics Research Department, New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manikandan, S., Nillni, Y. I., Zvolensky, M. J., Rohan, K. J., Carkeek, K. R., & Leyro, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Leyro, Teresa M.
Venue
Archives of Women s Mental Health
Published
2016-08-25
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1109-1117
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W2511419590
Cited by
23
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R36MH086170-01A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
emotion regulation, menstrual symptoms, menstrual cycle phases, perceived control, anxiety, luteal phase, hormonal variation, women's mental health
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Adult, Anxiety, Emotions, Female, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Premenstrual Syndrome, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review