Cited by 49Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

A systematic review of interventions for healthcare professionals to improve screening and referral for perinatal mood and anxiety disorders

Long, Molly M., Cramer, Robert J., Jenkins, Jennika, Bennington, Linda, Paulson, James F.·2019·Archives of Women's Mental Health

Abstract

Postpartum depression affects approximately 11% of women. However, screening for perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMAD) is rare and inconsistent among healthcare professionals. When healthcare professionals screen, they often rely on clinical judgment, rather than validated screening tools. The objective of the current study is to review the types and effectiveness of interventions for healthcare professionals that have been used to increase the number of women screened and referred for PMAD. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was utilized to guide search and reporting strategies. PubMed/Medline, PsychInfo/PsychArticles, Cumulative Index to Nursing, Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition databases were used to find studies that implemented an intervention for healthcare professionals to increase screening and referral for PMAD. Twenty-five studies were included in the review. Based on prior quality assessment tools, the quality of each article was assessed using an assessment tool created by the authors. The four main outcome variables were the following: percentage of women screened, percentage of women referred for services, percentage of women screened positive for PMAD, and provider knowledge, attitudes, and/or skills concerning PMAD. The most common intervention type was educational, with others including changes in electronic medical records and standardized patients for training. Study quality…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-018-0876-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 49

Authors
Long, M. M., Cramer, R. J., Jenkins, J., Bennington, L., & Paulson, J. F.
Affiliations
Old Dominion University (US)
Corresponding author
Long, Molly M.
Venue
Archives of Women's Mental Health
Published
2018-07-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
25-36
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W2810659392
Cited by
49
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
perinatal mood and anxiety disorders, postpartum depression, screening, referral, healthcare workers, provider education, electronic health records, standardized patients, provider knowledge and attitudes, patient-provider communication, screening protocol
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Referral and Consultation, Perinatal Care, Depression, Postpartum, Mood Disorders, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review