Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Noise level and ultrasound spectra during burring

E., Sorainen, E., Rytkönen·2002·Clinical Oral Investigations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the noise spectra of current dentistry equipment during normal work at the dental clinic and in the laboratory. In the study, noise was measured during the dental treatment of seven patients at a dental clinic and also in the acoustics laboratory, where working noise was simulated by drilling a polyacetal plate. All samples were analyzed in audible and ultrasonic areas in the one-third octave bands of 20-80,000 Hz. The measuring instruments used were B&K 4135 microphones, B&K 2633 preamplifiers, the B&K 2811 multiplexer, and the B&K 2133 real-time analyzer with the ZT 0318 high-frequency expansion unit. In the in situ measurements, the A-weighted sound pressure level was occasionally over 85 dB(A), and the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level, L(Aeq), was 76 dB(A). The noise level was most powerful in the one-third octave band of 40,000 Hz, where it was 74 dB. In laboratory measurements, the noise levels of the air-turbine and the micromotor hand pieces (n=16) were also most powerful in the one-third octave band of 40,000 Hz, where they were 80-89 dB. The L(Aeq) of the different micromotor handpieces (n=6) varied between 76 dB(A) and 77 dB(A), and the L(Aeq) of the turbine hand pieces (n=10) varied between 77 dB(A) and 82 dB(A). The noise of the drills is most powerful in the high frequencies, so using hearing protectors, it is possible that speech communication improves because the protectors attenuate high frequencies m…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00784-002-0163-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
E., S., & E., R.
Venue
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
133-136
ISSN
  • 1432-6981
  • 1436-3771
Cited by
9
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review