Cited by 13Human-Animal Interaction StudiesOccupational health in dentistryDental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 23 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Dog‐assisted therapy in the dental clinic. Part B. Hazards and assessment of potential risks to the health and safety of the dental therapy dog

Open access
Gussgard, Anne M., Weese, J. Scott, Hensten, Arne, Jokstad, Asbjørn·2019·Clinical and Experimental Dental Research

Abstract

Background: A dental therapy dog may help anxious patients in the dental clinic overcome their fear and facilitate the completion of necessary dental care. Dental clinic activities are associated with hazards that may pose potential risks to the health and safety of the dental therapy dog. Objectives: To describe potential hazards associated with risks to health and safety to therapy dogs in dental clinics and to present suggestions for risk minimisation by adopting best practices in dental clinic settings. Materials and method: Literature searches in Medline, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar for qualitative and quantitative assessments of occupational hazards and risks in dental clinics, in combination with a review of the reference list of the included studies. Identified hazards and risks were analysed relative to their relevance for the health and welfare of a therapy dog present in a dental clinic setting. Results: Workplace hazards in the dental clinic that apply to both humans and therapy dogs are allergies, sharps injury, eye injury, stress, rhinitis, hearing impairment, and other hazards. Additional concerns associated with risks for the dental therapy dog are situations involving erratic patient behaviour and threats if the patient is an undisclosed disease carrier. Risks to the health and safety of the dental therapy dog in the clinics are present but are low if the dental clinical staff and dog handlers comply with best practices. Conclusions: Best practice includes awareness amongst the clinic staff and the dog handler of all potential hazards in the dental clinic and on how to reduce these hazards as well as adverse events that may scare the dental therapy dog. The dental therapy dog team must be specially trained to work in a dental clinic. Each treatment session has to be exclusively tailored to that specific appointment and the individual patient.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This narrative review identifies dental-clinic occupational hazards that may also affect a dental therapy dog—allergies, sharps injury, eye injury, stress, rhinitis/conjunctivitis, hearing impairment, and poisoning—plus patient-behavior and disease-transmission risks. It concludes these risks are real but likely low if clinic staff and dog handlers follow best practices, although quantitative risk rates are not established.

Key findings

  • Workplace hazards in the dental clinic that apply to both humans and therapy dogs are allergies, sharps injury, eye injury, stress, rhinitis/conjunctivitis, hearing impairment, and other hazards such as poison ingestion; the ranking of these hazards for dogs is unknown.
  • Additional dog-specific concerns include erratic patient behavior—such as children poking or pinching the dog, elderly patients stepping or falling over it, or anxious patients squeezing it—and risks from patients as undisclosed disease carriers. Most human pathogens are not transmissible to dogs, so the risk of the dog acquiring a communicable disease from a human is described as low.
  • The paper concludes that risks to the dental therapy dog are present but low if dental clinical staff and dog handlers comply with best practices, yet there is currently no scientific data to substantiate whether individual risk rates are low, medium, or high.
  • The Medline search filtered for reviews yielded n = 405 articles; combining the search strategy with the dog-assisted therapy search described in the parallel paper yielded no articles.

Methods

  • Literature searches were performed in Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar for qualitative and quantitative assessments of occupational hazards and risks in dental clinic settings, combined with review of reference lists of included studies.
  • The Medline search through PubMed used an “occupational dentistry” strategy filtered for reviews, with no time or language limits, yielding n = 405 articles; combining it with the dog-assisted therapy search yielded no articles.
  • Identified hazards and risks were critically appraised for their potential relevance to the health and safety of a dental therapy dog working in a dental clinic setting.

Limitations

  • Stated: the paper reports no scientific data to substantiate whether the rates of individual risks to the dental therapy dog are low, medium, or high; no data to rank hazards for dogs; and no publications describing legal aspects of trained dental therapy dogs in dental clinics in the context of occupational safety and health regulations.
  • Stated: there is limited published evidence that permanent hearing impairment occurs among dentists from a noisy work environment, little published about dB SPL above 8,000 Hz in dental clinics, and noise-induced hearing impairment among dogs has not been studied systematically; risks to dogs from inhalation of contaminated aerosols also remain unknown.
  • Evident: this is a narrative/critical review rather than a systematic review or primary risk assessment, and it presents no formal quantitative risk estimates or outcome data for therapy dogs.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cre2.239

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 23 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Verify all 8 references — free account
  • Findingown data

    Combining the search strategy with the search strategy used to identify dog-assisted therapy described in the parallel paper yielded no articles.

    “Combining the search strategy with the search strategy used to identify dog‐assisted therapy described in the parallel paper (Gussgard et al., 2019) yielded no articles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Allergy to latex and other components of concern in dental facilities has not been reported in dogs.

    “Allergy to latex and other components of concern in dental facilities has not been reported in dogs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Noise-induced hearing impairment amongst dogs has not been studied systematically.

    “Noise‐induced hearing impairment amongst dogs has not been studied systematically, although dogs confined to kennels with high ambient noise levels appear to develop hearing impairment (Strain, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Currently, there are no data to substantiate a ranking of the relevance of occupational hazards regarding risks of health problems for the dental therapy dog.

    “Currently, there are no data to substantiate a ranking of their relevance regarding risks of health problems for the dental therapy dog (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Table 1

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingreasoning

    It is difficult to judge the risks for noise-induced hearing loss amongst dental therapy dogs because so little has been published about dB SPL above 8,000 Hz in dental clinics.

    “It is difficult to judge the risks for noise‐induced hearing loss amongst dental therapy dogs because so little has been published about dB SPL above 8,000 Hz in dental clinics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 21
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    A healthy human ear can hear sounds in the frequency range between 20 and 20,000 Hz, whereas dogs can readily perceive high-frequency sounds up to 45,000 Hz.

    “A healthy human ear can hear sounds in the frequency range between 20 and 20,000 Hz, whereas dogs can readily perceive high‐frequency sounds up to 45,000 Hz (Heffner, 1983), analogous to other members of the carnivore animal order (Malkemper, Topinka, & Burda, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Heffner, 1983 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Risks to the health and safety of the dental therapy dog in dental clinics are present but are low if the dental clinical staff and dog handlers comply with best practices.

    “Risks to the health and safety of the dental therapy dog in the clinics are present but are low if the dental clinical staff and dog handlers comply with best practices.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Patients may accidentally harm the dental therapy dog, and different considerations apply depending on whether the patient is a child or adult, has cognitive impairment, or has a mental or behavioural disorder.

    “Patients may accidentally harm the dog due to their action. Different considerations apply whether the patient is a child or an adult, a person with a cognitive impairment, or if the patient has a mental or behavioural disorder.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Aerosols contain mainly gram-positive organisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus spp.), gram-positive rod-shaped bacteria, endospore-forming and nonspore-forming bacteria, and mould fungi (e.g., Cladosporium and Penicillium).

    “Aerosols contain mainly gram‐positive organisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus spp.), gram‐positive, rod‐shaped bacteria, and those creating endospore as well as nonspore‐forming bacteria and mould fungi (e.g., Cladosporium and Penicillium; Kobza, Pastuszka, & Bragoszewska, 2018; Watanabe, Tamaki, Yokota, Matsuyama, & Kokeguchi, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kobza, Pastuszka, & Bragoszewska, 2018 source
    • cites Watanabe, Tamaki, Yokota, Matsuyama, & Kokeguchi, 2018 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Workplace hazards in the dental clinic that apply to both humans and therapy dogs are allergies, sharps injury, eye injury, stress, rhinitis, hearing impairment, and other hazards.

    “Workplace hazards in the dental clinic that apply to both humans and therapy dogs are allergies, sharps injury, eye injury, stress, rhinitis, hearing impairment, and other hazards.”
    • Also stated in: § Workplace hazards in a dental clinic setting · plain
      “Prevailing hazards associated with risks for occupational health problems for dental clinic staff members apply also to a dental therapy dog.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Poisoning is possible if a leaking or knocked-over container of medication or substance trickles to the floor, and the dental therapy dog may consume the spill regardless of whether it is innocuous or a schedule one drug or substance.

    “Poisoning is possible if a container with a medication or a substance is leaking or knocked over and the contents somehow trickle to the floor. The dental therapy dog may be tempted by the smell and taste to consume the spill out regardless of whether it is innocuous or a schedule one drug or substance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    A dental therapy dog positioned too close to an operation field risks eye damage if the clinical work generates high-velocity particulates.

    “A dental therapy dog positioned too close to an operation field risks eye damage if the clinical work generates high‐velocity particulates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    Accidental breakages, knocked-over bottles, solution spills, and leakages on benchtops or floors are instantaneous hazards for all stakeholders, and for a dental therapy dog also depend on how well the dog has been trained and is being monitored.

    “Accidental breakages, knocked‐over bottles, solution spills, and leakages on benchtops or floors are instantaneous hazards for all stakeholders, and for a dental therapy dog also dependant on how well the dog has been trained and is being monitored.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The chances are high that items such as used burs, unsheathed needles, empty plastic packs, metal matrix bands, and endodontic files may fall to the floor undetected, and the exploratory nature of dogs could result in trauma from biting or ingesting dropped items.

    “The chances are high that innocuous items such as used burs, unsheathed needles, empty plastic packs, metal matrix bands, and endodontic files may fall to the floor undetected, and the exploratory nature of dogs could result in trauma from biting or ingesting dropped items.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    Emotionally unstable patients may suddenly turn aggressive, scream, or shout during dental treatment and frighten the dog; some dental therapy dogs may be accustomed to such behaviour and not show signs of stress although the dog may not feel comfortable.

    “Emotionally unstable patients may suddenly turn aggressive, scream, or shout during the dental treatment and thereby frighten the dog. Some dental therapy dogs may be more accustomed to such behaviour and not show signs of stress although the dog may not feel comfortable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Extremely loud bursts of sound, such as gunshots or explosions, can rupture the eardrum or damage the bones in the middle ear resulting in an immediate and usually permanent hearing loss.

    “Extremely loud bursts of sound, such as gunshots or explosions, can also rupture the eardrum or damage the bones in the middle ear resulting in an immediate and usually permanent hearing loss (National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In humans, sounds more than 85 dB SPL can damage sensitive structures in the inner ear on one or both sides and cause noise-induced temporary or permanent hearing loss.

    “In humans, sounds more than 85 dB SPL can damage sensitive structures in the inner ear on one or both sides and cause noise‐induced temporary or permanent hearing loss.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Sounds of less than 75 dB SPL are unlikely to cause hearing loss even after prolonged exposure.

    “Sounds of less than 75 dB SPL are unlikely to cause hearing loss even after prolonged exposure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A dental therapy dog that undergoes an acute stress response during a treatment session risks becoming unusable because the animal will associate the negative experience with the dental clinic operatory and become very reluctant ever to enter a dental clinic.

    “A dental therapy dog that undergoes an acute stress response during a treatment session risk becoming unusable because the animal will associate the negative experience with the dental clinic operatory and become very reluctant ever to enter a dental clinic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    The inverse square law applies to sound, so the further a dental therapy dog is from a noise source, the lower the risk of hearing impairment.

    “As for other physical phenomena, the inverse square law also applies to sound. Hence, the further away the dental therapy dog is from the source of the noise, the lower the risks of hearing impairment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Many share the view, based on sound level measurements and questionnaire responses, that dental clinic staff members are placing their hearing health at risk in a typical daily work environment.

    “However, many share the view, based on sound level measurements and questionnaire responses, that dental clinic staff members are placing their hearing health at risk in a typical daily work environment (Burk & Neitzel, 2016; Myers, John, Kimball, & Fruits, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Burk & Neitzel, 2016 source
    • cites Myers, John, Kimball, & Fruits, 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    Elderly patients may have problems with their balance and unintentionally step on the dental therapy dog or stumble and fall over the dog.

    “Elderly patients may have problems with their balance and unintentionally step on the dental therapy dog or even stumble and fall over the dog.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Dog hearing becomes impaired around 8-10 years of age, with loss across the entire frequency range but primarily in the high-frequency area, similar to humans.

    “At around 8–10 years of age, the hearing of dogs becomes impaired. The hearing loss is across the entire frequency range, although primarily in the high‐frequency area, just like humans. (Ter Haar, Venker‐van Haagen, van den Brom, van Sluijs, & Smoorenburg, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ter Haar, Venker‐van Haagen, van den Brom, van Sluijs, & Smoorenburg, 2008 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Transient hearing loss can be measured amongst clinicians after use of ultrasound scalers, although the noise that is heard is resonance generated when the tip of the ultrasound scaler contacts the tooth or restoration surface.

    “Transient hearing loss can be measured amongst clinicians after use of ultrasound scalers, although the noise that is heard is resonance generated when the tip of the ultrasound scaler contacts the tooth or restoration surface (Chopra, Thomas, Mohan, & Sivaraman, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chopra, Thomas, Mohan, & Sivaraman, 2016 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A child's behaviour may be unpredictable, so there is a risk that the child may harm the dental therapy dog, for example by accidentally poking fingers into the dog's eye or pinching the dog.

    “A child's behaviour may be unpredictable; hence, there is a risk that the child's way of behaving may harm the dental therapy dog. Young children may for instance accidentally poke their fingers into the dental therapy dog's eye or pinch the dog.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    All risks for the health and safety of the dental therapy dog identified and appraised in the paper are conceivable risks, and currently there is no scientific data to substantiate whether the rates of the individual risks are low, medium, or high.

    “However, all the risks for the health and safety of the dental therapy dog that we have identified and appraised are conceivable risks, and currently, there is no scientific data to substantiate whether the rates of the individual risks may be considered as low, medium, or high.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    An arrangement in which the dental therapy dog moves to a floor carpet after the first few minutes reduces the risks of harmful noises and maintains a more distant position away from the hazards described.

    “Such an arrangement will reduce the risks of harmful noises and maintain a more distant position away from the hazards described in the previous sections.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Some patients, mostly children, may put their fingers in their mouth and then pet the dental therapy dog's legs; the dog may later groom its leg by licking and thereby end up with human bacteria, viruses, or fungi.

    “Some patients, mostly children, may put their fingers in their mouth to show the dentist, for instance, a loose tooth or to point at where it hurts and after that continue to pet the dental therapy dog's legs. The dental therapy dog may later groom his or her leg by licking and thereby end up with human bacteria (virus and fungi).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    The use of a dental therapy dog is an antianxiety approach that may provide the necessary support to overcome anxiety and achieve the objective of completing necessary dental care, thus avoiding the risks associated with use of sedation or general anaesthesia.

    “The use of a dental therapy dog is an antianxiety approach that may provide the necessary support to overcome anxiety and achieve this objective, thus avoiding the risks associated with use of sedation or general anaesthesia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Exposure to the microorganisms identified in aerosols is not considered a significant occupational hazard for dental care professionals.

    “The exposure to the microorganisms identified in aerosols is not considered a significant occupational hazard for dental care professionals (v).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites v

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A large dog may be too heavy for a small person, and a little dog may be too fragile if the patient needs to grasp around the dog's body or leg to feel safe and relaxed during dental treatment.

    “A large dog may be too heavy for a small, tiny person and a little dog may be too fragile if the patient needs to grasp around the dog's body or the dog's leg to feel safe and relaxed during the dental treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Introducing a dental therapy dog to work with patients in a dental clinical setting creates hazards, but these seem manageable given proper training and adherence to established clinical protocols.

    “Introducing a dental therapy dog to work with patients in a dental clinical setting creates hazards, but these seems to be manageable given proper training and adherence to established clinical protocols.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
27 of 27
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Airborne allergens in the dental clinic are also potentially hazardous for dogs.

    “It is reasonable to assume that these airborne allergens are also potentially hazardous for dogs, because recent evidence suggests that underlying causal factors of allergic diseases are likely common for dogs and their owners (Hakanen et al., 2018).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ultrasound scalers for removing calculus operate with a frequency of 25 kHz and emit sound in the range of 70–120 dB SPL.

    “Ultrasound scalers for removing calculus operate with a frequency of 25 kHz and emit sound in the range of 70–120 dB SPL.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most human pathogens are not transmissible to dogs.

    “Most human pathogens are not transmissible to dogs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Dogs with hearing loss may become depressed, disoriented, or aggressive, and may experience tinnitus accompanied by signs of stress such as pacing, frequent barking, or whining.

    “Dogs may become depressed, disoriented, or even aggressive because of difficulties with adapting to such a change. Signs may be dropping ears in spite of sounds, alternatively suddenly raising ears or tilting their head when there are no sounds. Dogs with hearing loss may also experience tinnitus, which often is accompanied by signs of stress, including pacing, frequent barking, or whining.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A rested dog has a higher threshold before signs of stress-activated behaviour due to work overload appear.

    “A rested dog presumably has a higher threshold before signs of stress‐activated behaviour due to work overload appear”
5 of 5

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gussgard A., 2019, Part A. Hazards and assessment of potential risks to the health and safety of humans, Clinical and Experimental Dental Research

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gussgard, A. M., Weese, J. S., Hensten, A., & Jokstad, A.
Affiliations
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • Ontario Veterinary College (CA)
Corresponding author
Gussgard, Anne M.
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-20
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
701-711
ISSN
2057-4347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969873020
Cited by
11
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Dental Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Occupational health in dentistry
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Keywords
therapy dogs, dental therapeutics, occupational hazards, risk assessment, sharps injuries, allergy, patient behavior, best practices, dental anxiety, animal-assisted therapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Welfare, Anxiety, Dental Care, Dental Clinics, Dogs, Humans, Risk Factors, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Animal Assisted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review