Cited by 23Dental Health and Care UtilizationOral microbiology and periodontitis researchHealth disparities and outcomes

Is dietary pattern a mediator of the relationship between socioeconomic status and dental caries?

Stein, Caroline, Cunha-Cruz, Joana, Hugo, Fernando Neves·2021·Clinical Oral Investigations

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether a healthy diet and added sugar mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and oral health status in adults.Methods This is a secondary cross-sectional analysis of adult participants from the 2015-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from the United States (n=3367). Structural equation modeling tested direct and indirect pathways from a latent variable for socioeconomic status to oral health via healthy eating (Health Eating Index) and added sugar in a multiple-mediator multiple-outcome model.Results Added sugar was directly associated with untreated dental caries [Standardized coefficient (SC)=0.10], and healthy eating was directly associated with both untreated dental caries (SC=-0.11) and tooth loss (SC=-0.05). Higher socioeconomic status was associated with lower untreated dental caries through direct (SC =-0.246) and small indirect paths via healthy diet (SC= -0.026), lower consumption of added sugar (SC=-0.007), and dental visits (SC=-0.162). Higher socioeconomic status was associated with fewer teeth lost through direct (SC =-0.306) and very small indirect paths via healthy diet (SC=-0.016), added sugar consumption (SC=-0.001), and untreated dental caries (SC=-0.094).Conclusions Both socioeconomic status and dietary pattern independently contributed to tooth loss and dental caries. The contribution of dietary factors as a mediator to socioeconomic inequities in oral health was small, and statistically significant.Clinical relevance A systems approach to socioeconomic inequities in oral health takes into account the complex relationships between socioeconomics, dietary patterns, oral health and health. Socioeconomic conditions and nutrition, as common risk factors to noncommunicable disorders, should be tackled in programs to improve oral health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00784-021-03852-5

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stein, C., Cunha-Cruz, J., & Hugo, F. N.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Corresponding author
Stein, Caroline
Venue
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published
2021-04-07
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
5441-5447
ISSN
  • 1432-6981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-3771
OpenAlex
W3149730050
Cited by
23
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Oral Investigations (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
socioeconomic status, dental caries, tooth loss, dietary habits, healthy eating, added sugars, oral health inequities, mediation, dental visits
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dental Caries, Diet, Humans, Nutrition Surveys, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review