Cited by 72Ethics and Social Impacts of AIPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryLiterary and Philosophical Studies

Artificial intelligence, ethics and human values: the cases of military drones and companion robots

de Swarte, Thibault, Boufous, Omar, Escalle, Paul·2019·Artificial Life and Robotics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10015-019-00525-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Swarte, T., Boufous, O., & Escalle, P.
Affiliations
IMT Atlantique (FR)
Venue
Artificial Life and Robotics
Published
2019-01-29
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
291-296
ISSN
  • 1433-5298 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7456
OpenAlex
W2913790922
Cited by
72
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
12.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Artificial Life and Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-13-CORD-0006)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Literary and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
AI ethics, human values, military drones, unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned combat aerial vehicles, companion robots, utilitarianism, military ethics, human dignity, nursing care, human-robot interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review