Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research

Poulose, B. K., Shelton, J., Phillips, S., Moore, D., Nealon, W., Penson, D., Beck, W., Holzman, M. D.·2012·Hernia

DOI 10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Lost in Translation: The Gap in Scientific Advancements and Clinical Application
Fernandez-Moure, J. S. (2016) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2016.00043 · Cited by 127
Nomenclature in Abdominal Wall Hernias: Is It Time for Consensus?
Parker, S. G., Wood, C. P. J., Sanders, D. L., & Windsor, A. C. J. (2017) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-017-4037-0 · Cited by 40
Postoperative Work and Activity Restrictions After Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review
Loor, M. M., Shah, P., Olavarria, O. A., Dhanani, N., Franz, M. G., Trautner, B. W., & Liang, M. K. (2021) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000004725 · Cited by 21

Authors: Poulose, B. K., Shelton, J., Phillips, S., Moore, D., Nealon, W., Penson, D., Beck, W., & Holzman, M. D.
Venue: Hernia
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2011-09-09
Volume: 16
Issue: 2
Pages: 179-183
ISSN: 1248-9204 (ISSN-L)
1265-4906
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9
OpenAlex: W1963493926
Cited by: 914
References: 0
FWCI: 22.90
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review