Cited by 167Machine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFault Detection and Control SystemsElectrical Fault Detection and Protection

A deep learning approach for fault diagnosis of induction motors in manufacturing

Open access
Shao, Si-Yu, Sun, Wen-Jun, Yan, Ru-Qiang, Wang, Peng, Gao, Robert X·2017·Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering

Abstract

Extracting features from original signals is a key procedure for traditional fault diagnosis of induction motors, as it directly influences the performance of fault recognition. However, high quality features need expert knowledge and human intervention. In this paper, a deep learning approach based on deep belief networks (DBN) is developed to learn features from frequency distribution of vibration signals with the purpose of characterizing working status of induction motors. It combines feature extraction procedure with classification task together to achieve automated and intelligent fault diagnosis. The DBN model is built by stacking multiple-units of restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM), and is trained using layer-by-layer pre-training algorithm. Compared with traditional diagnostic approaches where feature extraction is needed, the presented approach has the ability of learning hierarchical representations, which are suitable for fault classification, directly from frequency distribution of the measurement data. The structure of the DBN model is investigated as the scale and depth of the DBN architecture directly affect its classification performance. Experimental study conducted on a machine fault simulator verifies the effectiveness of the deep learning approach for fault diagnosis of induction motors. This research proposes an intelligent diagnosis method for induction motor which utilizes deep learning model to automatically learn features from sensor data and realize working status recognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10033-017-0189-y

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shao, S.-Y., Sun, W.-J., Yan, R.-Q., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Yan, Ru-Qiang
Venue
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10-23
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
1347-1356
ISSN
  • 1000-9345 (ISSN-L)
  • 2192-8258
OpenAlex
W2769634371
Cited by
167
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51575102)
  • The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Research Innovation Program for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province (KYLX16_0191)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical Fault Detection and Protection
Keywords
induction motor fault diagnosis, deep belief network, vibration signals, frequency spectrum features, feature extraction, restricted Boltzmann machine, hierarchical feature learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review