Cited by 164AI and HR TechnologiesEmployer Branding and e-HRMEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Collaboration among recruiters and Artificial Intelligence: Removing human prejudices in employment

Open access
Chen, Zhisheng·2023·Cognition, Technology & Work

Abstract

In the global war for talent, traditional recruiting methods are failing to cope with the talent competition, so employers need the right recruiting tools to fill open positions. First, we explore how talent acquisition has transitioned from digital 1.0 to 3.0 (AI-enabled) as the digital tool redesigns business. The technology of artificial intelligence has facilitated the daily work of recruiters and improved recruitment efficiency. Further, the study analyzes that AI plays an important role in each stage of recruitment, such as recruitment promotion, job search, application, screening, assessment, and coordination. Next, after interviewing with AI recruitment stakeholders (recruiters, managers, and applicants), the study discusses their acceptance criteria for each recruitment stage; stakeholders also raised concerns about AI recruitment. Finally, we suggest that managers need to be concerned about the cost of AI recruitment, legal privacy, recruitment bias, and the possibility of replacing recruiters. Overall, the study answers the following questions: (1) How artificial intelligence is used in various stages of the recruitment process. (2) Stakeholder (applicants, recruiters, managers) perceptions of AI application in recruitment. (3) Suggestions for managers to adopt AI in recruitment. In general, the discussion will contribute to the study of the use of AI in recruitment, as well as providing recommendations for implementing AI recruitment in practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10111-022-00716-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 164

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Abou Hamdan LF (2019) The role of artificial intelligence in the recruitment and selection processes: a systematic review American University of Beirut. Suliman S. AUB Students' Theses, Dissertations, and Projects
  2. Black JS van Esch PJBH AI-enabled recruiting: what is it and how should a manager use it? Bus Horiz 2020 63 2 215 226 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Judge TA Cable DM Higgins CAJHRMR The employment interview: a review of recent research and recommendations for future research Human Res Manag Rev. 2000 10 4 383 406
  4. Millot P, Hoc J (1997) Human-machine cooperation: metaphor or possible reality. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Cognitive Science, April,
  5. Petry T Digital HR: Veränderung des Personalmanagements durch digitale Medien und Technologien Media Management 2018 Germany Springer 43 56

Authors
Chen, Z.
Affiliations
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Zhisheng
Venue
Cognition, Technology & Work
Published
2022-09-28
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
135-149
ISSN
  • 1435-5558 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5566
OpenAlex
W4297540759
Cited by
164
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 20
FWCI
28.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition Technology & Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
artificial intelligence in recruitment, recruitment bias, talent acquisition, stakeholder perspectives, privacy concerns, recruitment efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review