Cited by 114Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Proximate causes of deforestation in the Bolivian lowlands: an analysis of spatial dynamics

Open access
Müller, Robert, Müller, Daniel, Schierhorn, Florian, Gerold, Gerhard, Pacheco, Pablo·2012·Regional Environmental Change

Abstract

Forests in lowland Bolivia suffer from severe deforestation caused by different types of agents and land use activities. We identify three major proximate causes of deforestation. The largest share of deforestation is attributable to the expansion of mechanized agriculture, followed by cattle ranching and small-scale agriculture. We utilize a spatially explicit multinomial logit model to analyze the determinants of each of these proximate causes of deforestation between 1992 and 2004. We substantiate the quantitative insights with a qualitative analysis of historical processes that have shaped land use patterns in the Bolivian lowlands to date. Our results suggest that the expansion of mechanized agriculture occurs mainly in response to good access to export markets, fertile soil, and intermediate rainfall conditions. Increases in small-scale agriculture are mainly associated with a humid climate, fertile soil, and proximity to local markets. Forest conversion into pastures for cattle ranching occurs mostly irrespective of environmental determinants and can mainly be explained by access to local markets. Land use restrictions, such as protected areas, seem to prevent the expansion of mechanized agriculture but have little impact on the expansion of small-scale agriculture and cattle ranching. The analysis of future deforestation trends reveals possible hotspots of future expansion for each proximate cause and specifically highlights the possible opening of new frontiers for deforestation due to mechanized agriculture. Whereas the quantitative analysis effectively elucidates the spatial patterns of recent agricultural expansion, the interpretation of long-term historic drivers reveals that the timing and quantity of forest conversion are often triggered by political interventions and historical legacies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10113-011-0259-0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One Brazilian Amazon study did not find any effect of land titling on deforestation.

    “While one Brazilian 485 Amazon study did not find any effect [133]”

    From A systematic comparison of deforestation drivers and policy effectiveness across the Amazon biome (2023) · cites this paper as [133]

    The Study area and historical land use section identifies the study area as the Bolivian lowlands. The Variables on land policies and Dynamics of land use change sections discuss protected areas, forest concessions, and indigenous territories, but do not report whether land titling affected deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Searches for land titling, tenure, and the claimed Brazilian finding found no passage addressing it; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Chomitz K, Gray D (1996) Roads, land use and deforestation: a spatial model applied to Belize. Word Bank Econ Rev 10(3):487-512
  2. Gerold G (2001) The pedo-ecological consequences of different land use-systems in the Lowlands of Bolivia (Dep. of Santa Cruz). In: Garcı ´a-Torres L, Benites J, Martinez-Vilela A (eds) Conserva- tion agriculture, a worldwide challenge, vol 2. ECAF, Madrid, pp 275-279
  3. Hecht S (2005) Soybeans, development and conservation on the Amazon frontier. Dev Change 36(2):375-404
  4. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
  5. IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 996pp.
  6. Kaimowitz D, Angelsen A (1998) Economic models of tropical deforestation: a review. Center for International Forestry Research. Bogor, Indonesia
  7. Killeen TJ, Calderon V, Soria L, Quezada B, Steininger MK, Harper G, Solo ´rzano L, Tucker C (2007) Thirty years of land-cover change in Bolivia. Ambio 36(7):600-606
  8. Killeen TJ, Guerra A, Calzada M, Correa L, Calderon V, Soria L, Quezada B, Steininger MK (2008) Total historical land-use change in Eastern Bolivia: who, where, when, and how much? Ecol Soc 13(1):36. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/ iss1/art36/. Accessed June 2009
  9. Kirby KR, Laurance WF, Albernaz AK, Schroth G, Fearnside PM, Bergen S, Venticinque EM, da Costa C (2006) The future of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Futures 38(4):432-453
  10. Long JS, Freese J (2006) Regression models for categorical depen- dent variables using stata. Stata Press, College Station
  11. Menard S (2002) Applied logistic regression analysis, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks Merry FD, Hildebrand PE, Pattie P, Carter DR (2002) An analysis of land conversion from sustainable forestry to pasture. A case study in the Bolivian Lowlands. Land Use Policy 19(3):207-219
  12. Mertens B, Kaimowitz D, Puntodewo A, Vanclay J, Mendez P (2004) Modeling deforestation at distinct geographic scales and time periods in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Int Reg Sci Rev 27(3):271-296
  13. ¨ller D, Zeller M (2002) Land-use dynamics in the central highlands of Vietnam: a spatial model combining village survey data with satellite imagery interpretation. Agric Econ 27(3):333-354
  14. Mu ¨ller R, Mu ¨ller D, Schierhorn F, Gerold G (2011) Spatiotemporal modeling of the expansion of mechanized agriculture in the Bolivian lowland forests. Appl Geogr 31(2):631-640
  15. Munroe DK, Southworth J, Tucker CM (2004) Modeling spatially and temporally complex land cover change: the case of Western Honduras. Prof Geogr 56(4):544-559
  16. Pontius RG, Batchu K (2003) Using the relative operating charac- teristic to quantify certainty in prediction of location of land cover change in India. Trans GIS 7(4):467-484
  17. Pontius RG, Millones M (2011) Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assess- ment. Int J Remote Sens 32(15):4407-4429
  18. Pontius RG, Pacheco P (2004) Calibration and validation of a model of forest disturbance in the Western Ghats, India 1920-1990. GeoJournal 61(4):325-334
  19. Stoian D, Henkemans AB (2000) Between extractivism and peasant agriculture: differentiation of rural settlements in the Bolivian Amazon. Int Tree Crops J 10(4):299-319
  20. Verburg PH, Veldkamp A (2004) Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales. Landscape Ecol 19(1):77-98
  21. Verburg PH, Kok K, Pontius RG, Veldkamp A (2006) Modeling land- use and landcover change. In: Lambin EF, Geist HJ (eds) Land- use and land-cover change: local processes and global impacts. Springer, Berlin, pp 117-135

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Müller, R., Müller, D., Schierhorn, F., Gerold, G., & Pacheco, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (DE)
  • Center for International Forestry Research (ID)
Corresponding author
Müller, Robert
Venue
Regional Environmental Change
Published
2011-10-28
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
445-459
ISSN
  • 1436-378X (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-3798
OpenAlex
W2094873854
Cited by
114
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Regional Environmental Change (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Geo-Leo e-docs (Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerkinformation) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EconStor Open Access Articles (submittedVersion)
  • Geo-Leo e-docs (Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerkinformation) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • FID-GEO SUB
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
deforestation, Bolivian lowlands, agricultural mechanization, cattle ranching, smallholder farming, forest conversion, land use change, protected areas, market access, deforestation hotspots, political intervention, historical legacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review