Cognitive and institutional influences on farmers’ adaptive capacity: insights into barriers and opportunities for transformative change in central Arizona
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Soft barriers to restoration include human, social, economic, institutional, and technological barriers.
“Soft barriers to restoration include human (cognitive and behavioral obstacles), social (undermined participation in decision-making and inequity), economic (market failures, perverse incentives, lack of domestic funds), institutional (mal-coordination of policies, government failures, path-dependent institutions and a lack of cross-sectoral policy making), and technological (140).”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [140]
Cites
Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. P. (2004) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-00650-090205 · Cited by 7,821 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Arneth, A., Olsson, L., Cowie, A., Erb, K.-H., Hurlbert, M., Kurz, W. A., Mirzabaev, A., & Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2021) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-054809 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“Soft barriers to restoration include human (cognitive and behavioral obstacles), social (undermined participation in decision-making and inequity), economic (market failures, perverse incentives, lack of domestic funds), institutional (mal-coordination of policies, government failures, path-dependent institutions and…”
BackgroundSingh, C., Osbahr, H., & Dorward, P. (2018) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1358-y · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eakin, H., York, A., Aggarwal, R., Waters, S., Welch, J., Rubiños, C., Smith-Heisters, S., Bausch, C., & Anderies, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eakin, Hallie
- Venue
- Regional Environmental Change
- Published
- 2015-04-22
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 801-814
- ISSN
- 1436-378X (ISSN-L)
- 1436-3798
- OpenAlex
- W1990084190
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 7.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Regional Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (SARP/CSI-NA110AR4310123)
- National Science Foundation (SES-0951366)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Keywords
- adaptive capacity, farmers, transformative change, irrigated agriculture, water markets, land market, megadrought, climate change adaptation, self-efficacy, land use change, livelihood transformation, risk-taking attitude, central Arizona
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review