Cited by 29Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesForest Management and Policy

Drivers and effects of deforestation in Colombia: A systems thinking approach

Arias-Gaviria, Jessica, Suarez, Cesar Freddy, Marrero-Trujillo, Veronica, P, J. Camilo Ochoa, Villegas-Palacio, Clara, Arango-Aramburo, Santiago·2021·Regional Environmental Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10113-021-01822-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Arias-Gaviria, J., Suarez, C. F., Marrero-Trujillo, V., P, J. C. O., Villegas-Palacio, C., & Arango-Aramburo, S.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO)
  • Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
Corresponding author
Arias-Gaviria, Jessica
Venue
Regional Environmental Change
Published
2021-09-09
Volume
21
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 1436-378X (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-3798
OpenAlex
W3199530057
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Regional Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
deforestation, Colombia, social-ecological systems, causal loop diagrams, illegal deforestation, forest governance, institutional capacity, regulatory enforcement, ecosystem services, systems thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review