Critical analysis of the hypothesized SNHG1/miR-195-5p/YAP1 axis
Open accessAbstract
How lncRNAs such as SNHG1 are integrated into cellular pathways to regulate, or be a regulatory component of, cellular processes is a question yet to be completely answered.A potential mechanism by which SNHG1 may exert its effect is through the so-called sponge effect.In this mechanism, SNHG1 (or other lncRNAs) is thought to bind miRNAs as a molecular sponge in a sequence-specific manner and inhibit their ability to bind and inhibit translation of a specific mRNA.The recent paper by Cheng et al. (Cheng et al. 2022) makes just these connections, in this case, between SNHG1, miRNA-195-5p, and the Hippo pathway gene, YAP1.In their proposed model, miRNA-195-5p binds to, and causes degradation of, YAP1 mRNA.MiRNA-195-5p is in turn modulated through the sponging activity of SNHG1.These interactions theoretically occur through a region of 7 nucleotide complementarity.Thus, YAP1 target protein expression can be modulated through a complex interplay involving the degree of SNHG1 and miR-195-5p expression.High SNHG1 should lead to greater sponging of miR-195-5p, and result in high YAP1 mRNA and protein levels, and conversely, low SNHG1 should lead to less sponging of miR-195-5p, and therefore low YAP1 mRNA and protein levels.However, we would like to call attention to some aspects of the published study which are common in the field overall and to offer a counterpoint to the conclusions drawn.In the human genome, there are possibly 183,000 occurrences of the 7 nucleotide sequence being suggested to confer specificity in the binding of SNHG1 to miR-195-5p and, subsequently, YAP1 (calculated as the 3 billion bp human genome divided by the frequency of random appearance of the given 7 nt sequence -4 7 ).Within protein-coding regions, which are estimated to be 1.5% of the genome, there may be 2746 (4.5 × 10 7 /4 7 ) occurrences of this sequence.Indeed, miRNA target prediction websites (miRDB, miRDB.organd
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wrongly identified reagents can cause failed attempts to reproduce published results.
“These wrongly identified reagents can produce a range of downstream consequences, including failed attempts to reproduce published results (3, 5, 7, 11, 16), and potentially incorrect interpretations of preclinical data leading to misdirected translational research (10, 12, 25).”
From Misspellings or “miscellings”—Non‐verifiable and unknown cell lines in cancer research publications (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
2 retracted
Zhang, H., Zhou, D., Ying, M., et al. (2016) · Medical Science Monitor · doi:10.12659/msm.898574 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
RetractedZhang, H., Zhou, D., Ying, M., et al. (2021) · Medical Science Monitor · doi:10.12659/msm.935056 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
RetractedHuang, D., Wei, Y., Zhu, J., & Wang, F. (2019) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2019.143994 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
lncRNA SNHG1 Promotes Progression of Cervical Cancer Through miR-195/NEK2 Axis
Ji, Y., Meng, M., & Miao, Y. (2020) · Cancer Management and Research · doi:10.2147/cmar.s277064 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Sheng, H., Deng, F., et al. (2020) · The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.1002/kjm2.12318 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Cheng, F., Wang, L., Yi, S., et al. (2022) · Functional & Integrative Genomics · doi:10.1007/s10142-022-00876-2 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Li, D., Zhang, X., Yang, Y., et al. (2019) · PubMed · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Misspellings or “miscellings”—Non‐verifiable and unknown cell lines in cancer research publications
Oste, D. J., Pathmendra, P., Richardson, R. A. K., Johnson, G., Ao, Y., Arya, M. D., Enochs, N. R., Hussein, M., Kang, J., Lee, A., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.34995 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zielske, S. P., & Cackowski, F. C.
- Affiliations
- Wayne State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cackowski, Frank C.
- Venue
- Functional & Integrative Genomics
- Published
- 2022-12-17
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-2
- ISSN
- 1438-793X (ISSN-L)
- 1438-7948
- PMC
- PMC9758073
- OpenAlex
- W4312066467
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 5
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Functional & Integrative Genomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P50CA186786)
- DOD Prostate Cancer Research Program (W81XWH2010394)
- Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
- Keywords
- SNHG1, miR-195-5p, YAP, long non-coding RNA, Hippo signaling pathway, miRNA target prediction
- MeSH terms
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, MicroRNAs, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, RNA, Long Noncoding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review