Cited by 15Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementMental Health Treatment and AccessCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases

Prevalence and influencing factors of patient delay in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dong, Jianhui, Ma, Yuxia, Chen, Yanru, Guo, Jiali, Zhang, Tong, Yang, Tingting, Zhang, Hongyan, Yan, Fanghong +1 more·2024·Neurosurgical Review

Abstract

Purpose Determine the prevalence and influencing factors of patient delay in stroke patients and explore variation in prevalence by country and delayed time. Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), Weipu database, and Wanfang database were comprehensively searched for observational studies from inception to April, 2023. The pooled prevalence, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with Stata 16.0 software. Results In total, 2721 articles were screened and data from 70 studies involving 85,468 subjects were used in meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of patient delay in stroke patients was 59% (95% CI, 0.54-0.64). The estimates of pooled prevalence calculated for African, Asian, and European patient delay in stroke patients were 55% (0.29-0.81), 61% (0.56-0.66), and 49% (0.34-0.64).According to the patient delay time, the prevalence of 6 h, 5 h, 4.5 h, 3.5 h, 3 h and 2 h were 54% (0.47-0.61), 73% (0.61-0.86), 60% (0.49-0.71), 81% (0.68-0.93), 52% (0.42-0.62), 63% (0.19-1.07). Distance from the place of onset to the hospital > 10 km [OR=2.49, 95%CI (1.92, 3.24)], having medical insurance [OR = 0.45, 95%CI (0.26,0.80)], lack of stroke-related knowledge [OR = 1.56, 95%CI (1.08,2.26)], education level below junior high school [OR = 1.69, 95%CI (1.22,2.36)], non-emergency medical services (Non-EMS) [OR = 2.10, 95%CI (1.49,2.97)], living in rural area…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10143-024-02436-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 34 · Cited by 15

Authors
Dong, J., Ma, Y., Chen, Y., Guo, J., Zhang, T., Yang, T., Zhang, H., Yan, F., & Han, L.
Affiliations
  • Lanzhou University (CN)
  • Gansu Provincial Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Ma, Yuxia
  • Han, Lin
Venue
Neurosurgical Review
Published
2024-05-03
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
202-202
ISSN
  • 0344-5607 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-2320
OpenAlex
W4396613548
Cited by
15
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurosurgical Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Nature Science Foundation of China (72274087)
  • The Fund of China Medical Board (20-374)
  • National scientific research training plan of Gansu Provincial Hospital (19SYPYA-4)
  • The Research Funds for the school of nursing of Lanzhou University (LZUSON202002)
  • Chengguan District Science and Technology Bureau of Lanzhou (2022SHFZ0002)
  • Nature Science Foundation of Gansu Province (22JR5RA218)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Keywords
stroke, patient delay, treatment delay, prevalence, risk factors, distance to hospital, health insurance, stroke knowledge, educational attainment, cross-national comparison, health education, health insurance coverage, stroke rehabilitation outcomes, stroke rehabilitation access, stroke rehabilitation funding
MeSH terms
Humans, Time Factors, Prevalence, Stroke, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review