Cited by 24Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease in patients with lung cancer and interstitial lung disease treated with chemotherapy

Open access
Akaike, Kimitaka, Saruwatari, Koichi, Oda, Seitaro, Shiraishi, Shinya, Takahashi, Hiroshi, Hamada, Shohei, Iyama, Shinji, Horio, Yuko +6 more·2020·International Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Background We examined whether fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18 F-FDG PET/CT) performed before chemotherapy could predict the onset of acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) in patients with lung cancer and ILD treated with chemotherapy. Methods Thirty-three patients with lung cancer and ILD who underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT and were treated with chemotherapy at Kumamoto University Hospital between April 2006 and March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max) of interstitial lesions was measured to quantify the background ILD activity. A prediction model of AE-ILD was developed using logistic regression analyses for the SUV max, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted. Results Among the 33 patients, 7 experienced AE-ILD. The SUV max of contralateral interstitial lesions was significantly higher in patients with vs. without AE-ILD (median SUV max: 2.220 vs. 1.795, P = 0.025). Univariable logistic regression analyses showed that the SUV max of contralateral interstitial lesions trended towards being significantly associated with the onset of AE-ILD [odds ratio: 8.683, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-85.83, P = 0.064]. The area under the ROC curve of the SUV max for predicting AE-ILD was 0.780 (95% CI 0.579-0.982, P = 0.025). The optimal cut-off value for SUV max was 2.005, with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.857 and 0.769, respectively. Conclusions The SUV max of contralateral interstitial lesions in 18 F-FDG PET/CT images might be useful for predicting the onset of AE-ILD in patients with lung cancer and ILD treated with chemotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10147-019-01584-x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drug-induced lung injury occurs more frequently in groups with high CRP, SUVmax, or GPS.

    “Furthermore, drug‑induced lung injury occurs more frequently in groups with high CRP, SUVmax, or GPS(32‑34).”

    From Clinical impact of inflammatory and nutrition index based on metabolic tumor activity in non‑small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy. (2024) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Abstract reports higher SUVmax in patients who experienced chemotherapy-related acute exacerbation of ILD than in those who did not (2.220 vs. 1.795; P = 0.025). This supports the SUVmax portion for patients with lung cancer and pre-existing ILD, but not the broader claim about drug-induced lung injury; this source does not establish the CRP or GPS portions of the multiply cited sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akaike, K., Saruwatari, K., Oda, S., Shiraishi, S., Takahashi, H., Hamada, S., Iyama, S., Horio, Y., Tomita, Y., Saeki, S., Okamoto, S., Ichiyasu, H., Fujii, K., & Sakagami, T.
Affiliations
  • Kumamoto University Hospital (JP)
  • Kumamoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Saruwatari, Koichi
Venue
International Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2019-11-28
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
681-690
ISSN
  • 1341-9625 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-7772
OpenAlex
W2991077970
Cited by
23
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kumamoto University Repository (Kumamoto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, chemotherapy-induced lung injury, 18F-FDG PET/CT, standardized uptake value, predictive biomarkers
MeSH terms
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Aged, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Lung Diseases, Interstitial, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review