Cited by 21Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsFungal Infections and Studies

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of micafungin in Japanese patients with deep mycosis: a post-marketing survey report

Hanadate, Tomoko, Wakasugi, Masahiro, Sogabe, Keizo, Kobayashi, Toshimitsu, Horita, Hisanori, Kawamura, Ikuo, Matsui, Keita, Sou, Masahiro +2 more·2011·Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of micafungin were evaluated in a Japanese post-marketing survey involving 1,142 patients with deep mycosis caused by Candida or Aspergillus. The overall clinical response was 83.0%, and the respective responses for patients with candidiasis or aspergillosis were 86.3 and 70.8%. With regard to drug reactions, 562 adverse reactions were observed in 28.5% of patients. Among the 83 serious adverse drug reactions reported by 53 patients, a causal relationship with micafungin was assessed as definite or probable for 6 reactions in 5 patients. Age and baseline hepatic and renal function status did not affect the incidence of adverse reactions, although incidence increased significantly in proportion to the severity of mycosis and daily dose (p < 0.01). In multiple logistic regression analysis, neither baseline hepatic impairment nor increased daily dose of micafungin affected the incidence of hepatobiliary disorders, however, the severity of mycosis was found to correlate significantly with hepatobiliary disorders (p = 0.031). Taken together, our post-marketing findings show that micafungin is effective against deep mycosis caused by Candida or Aspergillus in patients across a range of backgrounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10156-011-0219-0

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Micafungin has been used as primary therapy in noncomparative studies of IA, with response rates ranging from 45% to 71%.

    “The echinocandins caspofungin and micafungin have been used as primary therapy in noncomparative studies of IA, with response rates ranging from 33% to 57% for caspofungin (687–690) and 45% to 71% for micafungin (54, 479, 691).”

    From Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019 (2019) · cites this paper as [691]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanadate, T., Wakasugi, M., Sogabe, K., Kobayashi, T., Horita, H., Kawamura, I., Matsui, K., Sou, M., Hori, Y., & Hoshino, Y.
Affiliations
Astellas Pharma (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Hanadate, Tomoko
Venue
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
622-632
ISSN
1341-321X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063203063
Cited by
21
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2011-01-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
micafungin, deep mycosis, candidiasis, aspergillosis, antifungal efficacy, drug safety, adverse drug reactions, hepatobiliary diseases, Candida, Aspergillus, post-marketing surveillance, Japanese patients
MeSH terms
Micafungin, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aspergillosis, Aspergillus, Candida, Candidiasis, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review