The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631289019003001 · Cited by 10,847
(2014) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research · doi:10.4135/9781446294406.n148 · Cited by 7,250
Neufeld, A., & Ryan, A. G. (1988) · Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation · doi:10.3138/cjpe.3.006 · Cited by 5,913
The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process
Hajer, M. A. (1997) · doi:10.1093/019829333x.001.0001 · Cited by 4,184
Latour, B. (1987) · Cited by 4,106
The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations
Kaplan, N., Merton, R. K., & Storer, N. W. (1974) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3102264 · Cited by 4,005
Handbook of Science and Technology Studies
Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Peterson, J., & Pinch, T. (1995) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412990127 · Cited by 2,367
Downs, A. (1967) · doi:10.7249/cb156 · Cited by 1,983
The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-4501 · Cited by 1,610
Utilization-focused evaluation : the new century text
Patton, M. Q. (1997) · Cited by 1,469
Cited by
Europe adapts to climate change: Comparing National Adaptation Strategies
Biesbroek, G. R., Swart, R. J., Carter, T. R., Cowan, C., Henrichs, T., Mela, H., Morecroft, M. D., & Rey, D. (2010) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005 · Cited by 772
Rethinking Communication in Innovation Processes: Creating Space for Change in Complex Systems
Leeuwis, C., & Aarts, N. (2011) · The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension · doi:10.1080/1389224x.2011.536344 · Cited by 450
Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science–policy interface
Wesselink, A., Buchanan, K. S., Georgiadou, Y., & Turnhout, E. (2013) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.008 · Cited by 224
Parkhurst, J. (2016) · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · doi:10.4324/9781315675008 · Cited by 756
Why do we still need participatory technology assessment?
Hennen, L. (2012) · Poiesis & Praxis · doi:10.1007/s10202-012-0122-5 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoppe, R.
- Venue
- Poiesis & Praxis
- Published
- 2005-05-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 199-215
- ISSN
- 1615-6609 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-6617
- OpenAlex
- W2127227780
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 33.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10202-005-0074-0
- The paper
- Hoppe, R. (2005). Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poiesis & Praxis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-005-0074-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
