Rethinking Communication in Innovation Processes: Creating Space for Change in Complex Systems
Open accessAbstract
This paper systematically rethinks the role of communication in innovation processes, starting from largely separate theoretical developments in communication science and innovation studies. Literature review forms the basis of the arguments presented. The paper concludes that innovation is a collective process that involves the contextual re-ordering of relations in multiple social networks. Such re-ordering cannot be usefully understood in terms of ‘diffusing’ ready-made innovations. Hence, we need to think about communication as playing a role in innovation development and ‘design’. In such development processes, everyday communicative exchanges and self-organisation among societal agents are likely to be of critical significance in connection with the re-ordering of social relationships. In this light, the role of communication professionals and deliberate communication is often overstated or misinterpreted. Instead of striving for predefined change, communication professionals should facilitate that ‘the potential for change’ in complex dynamical settings increases. This includes efforts to enhance the survival chances of existing initiatives for change, by facilitating that they become more effectively adapted and/or linked to their dynamic selection environment than competing initiatives. This implies that communication professionals must play broader intermediary roles than before. A systematic rethinking of the role of communication in innovation processes in view of recent developments in communication sciences, innovation studies and complex systems thinking is largely absent. This paper fills a void.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much of the complexity literature on organizational communication is conceptual or theoretical in nature.
“Much of the literature is conceptual or theoretical in nature, introducing the complexity approach to a specific area of study (e.g.Leeuwis & Aarts, 2011), providing alternative views or methods to the analysis (e.g.Corman et al., 2002), or reflecting the use of complexity science in the communication research in general (e.g.Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001).”
From Complexity and Organizational Communication (2016) · cites this paper as Leeuwis & Aarts, 2011
Cites
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predicting farmer uptake of new agricultural practices: a tool for research, extension and policy
Kuehne, G., Llewellyn, R., Pannell, D. J., Wilkinson, R., Dolling, P., Ouzman, J., & Ewing, M. (2017) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.06.007 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Caffaro, F., Micheletti Cremasco, M., Roccato, M., & Cavallo, E. (2020) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.028 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Anchoring of innovations: Assessing Dutch efforts to harvest energy from glasshouses
Elzen, B., van Mierlo, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2012) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2012.10.006 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Self-citationComplexity and Organizational Communication
Poutanen, P., Siira, K., & Aula, P. (2016) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484316639713 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leeuwis, C., & Aarts, N.
- Affiliations
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Leeuwis, Cees
- ORCID
- Leeuwis, Cees
- Venue
- The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-36
- ISSN
- 1389-224X (ISSN-L)
- 1750-8622
- OpenAlex
- W2131299704
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 87.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
- Keywords
- social networks, self-organization, communication professionals, intermediary role, complex dynamical systems, innovation design, change facilitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review