Cited by 450Innovation, Technology, and SocietyMedia and Communication StudiesOrganizational Change and Leadership

Rethinking Communication in Innovation Processes: Creating Space for Change in Complex Systems

Open access
Leeuwis, Cees, Aarts, Noelle·2011·The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension

Abstract

This paper systematically rethinks the role of communication in innovation processes, starting from largely separate theoretical developments in communication science and innovation studies. Literature review forms the basis of the arguments presented. The paper concludes that innovation is a collective process that involves the contextual re-ordering of relations in multiple social networks. Such re-ordering cannot be usefully understood in terms of ‘diffusing’ ready-made innovations. Hence, we need to think about communication as playing a role in innovation development and ‘design’. In such development processes, everyday communicative exchanges and self-organisation among societal agents are likely to be of critical significance in connection with the re-ordering of social relationships. In this light, the role of communication professionals and deliberate communication is often overstated or misinterpreted. Instead of striving for predefined change, communication professionals should facilitate that ‘the potential for change’ in complex dynamical settings increases. This includes efforts to enhance the survival chances of existing initiatives for change, by facilitating that they become more effectively adapted and/or linked to their dynamic selection environment than competing initiatives. This implies that communication professionals must play broader intermediary roles than before. A systematic rethinking of the role of communication in innovation processes in view of recent developments in communication sciences, innovation studies and complex systems thinking is largely absent. This paper fills a void.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1389224x.2011.536344

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much of the complexity literature on organizational communication is conceptual or theoretical in nature.

    “Much of the literature is conceptual or theoretical in nature, introducing the complexity approach to a specific area of study (e.g.Leeuwis & Aarts, 2011), providing alternative views or methods to the analysis (e.g.Corman et al., 2002), or reflecting the use of complexity science in the communication research in general (e.g.Tsoukas & Hatch, 2001).”

    From Complexity and Organizational Communication (2016) · cites this paper as Leeuwis & Aarts, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leeuwis, C., & Aarts, N.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Leeuwis, Cees
Venue
The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension
Published
2011-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
21-36
ISSN
  • 1389-224X (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-8622
OpenAlex
W2131299704
Cited by
450
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 20
FWCI
87.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Communication Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
Keywords
social networks, self-organization, communication professionals, intermediary role, complex dynamical systems, innovation design, change facilitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review