Cited by 90Information Society and Technology TrendsSocial Capital and NetworksICT in Developing Communities

Social capital and access

Warschauer, Mark·2003·Universal Access in the Information Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10209-002-0040-8

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warschauer, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Warschauer, Mark
Venue
Universal Access in the Information Society
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
315-330
ISSN
  • 1615-5289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-5297
OpenAlex
W2158870266
Cited by
90
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
22.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Universal Access in the Information Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
social capital, information society, ICT access, computer access, internet use, technology projects, India

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review