The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Antona, M., Chen, J. Y. C., Dong, J., Duffy, V. G., Fang, X., Fidopiastis, C., Fragomeni, G., Fu, L. P., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259 · Cited by 524
Johansson, S., Gulliksen, J., & Gustavsson, C. (2021) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-020-00714-x · Cited by 224
Self-citationHuman-Centered Artificial Intelligence for Designing Accessible Cultural Heritage
Pisoni, G., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Gijlers, H., & Tonolli, L. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11020870 · Cited by 183
Accessibility in Software Practice: A Practitioner’s Perspective
Bi, T., Xia, X., Lo, D., Grundy, J., Zimmermann, T., & Ford, D. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3503508 · Cited by 109
Oswal, S. K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication · doi:10.1145/3328020.3353957 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Persson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A. A., & Gulliksen, J.
- Venue
- Universal Access in the Information Society
- Published
- 2014-05-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 505-526
- ISSN
- 1615-5289 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-5297
- OpenAlex
- W2080841303
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z
- The paper
- Persson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A. A., & Gulliksen, J. (2015). Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
